Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB vs TITAN V

AMD

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

2023Core: 2321 MHzBoost: 2581 MHz
RX family
·······
VS

TITAN V

2017Core: 1200 MHzBoost: 1455 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB vs TITAN V Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB vs TITAN V FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB vs TITAN V: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

2023

Why buy it

  • 2.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $2,710 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 938.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 69.5 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

TITAN V

2017

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • 2017 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 937.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,999 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 69.5 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (20,096 vs 20,077), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR 3 (2023) and FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while TITAN V is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 7nm process instead of 12nm, 40 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2017. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,710 cheaper on MSRP at $289 vs $2,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 938.7% (69.5 vs 6.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB vs TITAN V Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,096 points. Launch price was $334.

NVIDIA

TITAN V

The TITAN V is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2017. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,077 points. Launch price was $2,999.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB scores 20,096 and the TITAN V reaches 20,077 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is built on RDNA 2.0 while the TITAN V uses Volta, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs 5,120 (TITAN V). Raw compute: 13.21 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs 14.9 TFLOPS (TITAN V). Boost clocks: 2581 MHz vs 1455 MHz.

FeatureRadeon RX 6750 GRE 12GBTITAN V
G3D Mark Score
20,096
20,077
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Volta
Process Node
7 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2560
5120+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
13.21 TFLOPS
14.9 TFLOPS+13%
Boost Clock
2581 MHz+77%
1455 MHz
ROPs
64
96+50%
TMUs
160
320+100%
L1 Cache
0.5 MB
7.5 MB+1400%
L2 Cache
3 MB
4.5 MB+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The TITAN V does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureRadeon RX 6750 GRE 12GBTITAN V
Upscaling Tech
FSR 3
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 12 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs 653 GB/s (TITAN V) — a 70.1% advantage for the TITAN V. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB and 3072-bit on the TITAN V. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs 4.5 MB (TITAN V) — the TITAN V has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon RX 6750 GRE 12GBTITAN V
VRAM Capacity
12 GB
12 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
HBM2
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
653 GB/s+70%
Bus Width
192-bit
3072-bit+1500%
L2 Cache
3 MB
4.5 MB+50%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs 12.1 (TITAN V). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon RX 6750 GRE 12GBTITAN V
DirectX
12.2
12.1
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs NVENC 6.0 (TITAN V). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (TITAN V).

FeatureRadeon RX 6750 GRE 12GBTITAN V
Encoder
VCN 4.0
NVENC 6.0
Decoder
VCN 4.0
PureVideo HD VP9
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB draws 250W versus the TITAN V's 250W — a 0% difference. The TITAN V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs 600W (TITAN V). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

FeatureRadeon RX 6750 GRE 12GBTITAN V
TDP
250W
250W
Recommended PSU
600W
600W
Power Connector
8-pin
2x 8-pin
Length
240mm
267mm
Height
111mm
112mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-12%
85°C
Perf/Watt
80.4
80.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB came in at $289, while the TITAN V launched at $2999. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB was 90.4% cheaper ($2710 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 69.5 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs 6.7 (TITAN V) — the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB offers 937.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB (2023 vs 2017).

FeatureRadeon RX 6750 GRE 12GBTITAN V
MSRP
$289-90%
$2999
Performance per Dollar
69.5+937%
6.7
Codename
Navi 22
GV100
Release
October 17 2023
December 7 2017
Ranking
#75
#109

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.