
Radeon RX 6800

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 6800 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon RX 6800 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon RX 6800 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon RX 6800
2020Why buy it
- ✅0.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($579 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 241mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 110W.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 250W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 38.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $579 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 6800 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon RX 6800
The Radeon RX 6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,056 points. Launch price was $579.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,119 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6800 scores 22,056 and the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU reaches 22,119 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6800 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon RX 6800) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6800) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 2105 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (Radeon RX 6800) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 192.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,056 | 22,119 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 | 6144+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.17 TFLOPS | 26.73 TFLOPS+65% |
| Boost Clock | 2105 MHz+26% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240+25% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 6 MB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60+25% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the Radeon RX 6800 is on the newer stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU stays on DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6800 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU carries 12 GB. Radeon RX 6800 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Radeon RX 6800) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — a 18.5% advantage for the Radeon RX 6800. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon RX 6800 and 192-bit on the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 6800) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+19% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 6800) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 6800) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6800) vs AV1,H.265,H.264 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,H.265,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6800 draws 250W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 110W — a 77.8% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon RX 6800) vs 150W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 240mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 110W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 150W-77% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 240mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 201.1+128% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6800 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $579 | — |
| Codename | Navi 21 | AD104 |
| Release | October 28 2020 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #65 | #47 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














