Radeon RX 6900 XT vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Radeon RX 6900 XT
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6900 XT
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6900 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 113.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6900 XT | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+113.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-113.2%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6900 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $385 (vs $209), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 15.8% better value per dollar than the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6900 XT | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+15.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($385) | ✅More affordable ($209) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6900 XT and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Radeon RX 6900 XT
The Radeon RX 6900 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,729 points. Launch price was $999.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 6900 XT scores 26,729 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 12,535 — the Radeon RX 6900 XT leads by 113.2%. The Radeon RX 6900 XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Raw compute: 23.04 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Boost clocks: 2250 MHz vs 1777 MHz. Ray tracing: 80 RT cores (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 80.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6900 XT | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,729+113% | 12,535 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120+100% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 23.04 TFLOPS+153% | 9.098 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2250 MHz+27% | 1777 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+300% | 32 |
| TMUs | 320+300% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 2.5 MB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 80+300% | 20 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6900 XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6900 XT | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6900 XT comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 6900 XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — a 128.6% advantage for the Radeon RX 6900 XT. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the Radeon RX 6900 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6900 XT | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+129% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6900 XT | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6900 XT | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6900 XT draws 300W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 130W — a 79.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 850W (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 242mm, occupying 2.5 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 66°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6900 XT | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 130W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 850W | 450W-47% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 242mm |
| Height | 120mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2.5 | 2-20% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 66°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 89.1 | 96.4+8% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6900 XT launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $385, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 and now averages $209. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB costs 45.7% less ($176 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 69.4 (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the Radeon RX 6900 XT offers 15.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6900 XT | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $249-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $385 | $209-46% |
| Performance per Dollar | 69.4+16% | 60.0 |
| Codename | Navi 21 | GA106 |
| Release | October 28 2020 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #35 | #211 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6900 XT and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
