CPU
GPU
Radeon RX 6900 XT
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO W7900
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6900 XT
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7900
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W7900 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.5% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (48 GB vs 16 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6900 XT.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6900 XT | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.5%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6900 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $385 versus $3,500 for the Radeon PRO W7900, it costs 89% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 761.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6900 XT | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+761.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($385) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($3,500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6900 XT and Radeon PRO W7900
Radeon RX 6900 XT
The Radeon RX 6900 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,729 points. Launch price was $999.
Radeon PRO W7900
The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 6900 XT scores 26,729 versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 28,211 — the Radeon PRO W7900 leads by 5.5%. The Radeon RX 6900 XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon PRO W7900 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900). Raw compute: 23.04 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900). Boost clocks: 2250 MHz vs 2495 MHz. Ray tracing: 80 RT cores (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs 96 (Radeon PRO W7900).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6900 XT | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,729 | 28,211+6% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120 | 6144+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 23.04 TFLOPS | 61.32 TFLOPS+166% |
| Boost Clock | 2250 MHz | 2495 MHz+11% |
| ROPs | 128 | 192+50% |
| TMUs | 320 | 384+20% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 80 | 96+20% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6900 XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7900 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6900 XT | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6900 XT comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 has 48 GB. The Radeon PRO W7900 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900) — a 68.8% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7900) — the Radeon PRO W7900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6900 XT | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 48 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 864 GB/s+69% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6900 XT | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6900 XT | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6900 XT draws 300W versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 295W — a 1.7% difference. The Radeon PRO W7900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 850W (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs 750W (Radeon PRO W7900). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2.5 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6900 XT | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 295W-2% |
| Recommended PSU | 850W | 750W-12% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 120mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2.5-17% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 89.1 | 95.6+7% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6900 XT launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $385, while the Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999 and now averages $3500. The Radeon RX 6900 XT costs 89% less ($3115 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 69.4 (Radeon RX 6900 XT) vs 8.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) — the Radeon RX 6900 XT offers 756.8% better value. The Radeon PRO W7900 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6900 XT | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999-75% | $3999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $385-89% | $3500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 69.4+757% | 8.1 |
| Codename | Navi 21 | Navi 31 |
| Release | October 28 2020 | April 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #35 | #26 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6900 XT and Radeon PRO W7900
