GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7900
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO W7900
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7900
Why is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon PRO W7900?
The battle between the high-end industrial Radeon PRO W7900 and the expert GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER reveals a fascinating clash between absolute muscle and modern feature innovation. Both are world-class icons of the current era, but they target completely different worlds of uncompromised performance.
Technically, the Radeon PRO W7900 wins on absolute memory scale with its colossal 48GB GDDR6 buffer—three times the capacity of the enthusiast card—making it a world-class engine for mission-critical industrial datasets. However, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER features superior Ray Tracing efficiency and the revolutionary DLSS 3 Frame Generation that provide significantly more fluidity in high-fidelity titles. Moving between these two is a choice between uncompromised industrial throughput and the latest stationary AI innovation in 2026.
The AMD Radeon PRO W7900 is the ultimate winner for enterprise users and researchers who priority uncompromised memory depth for industrial-scale workloads. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the ultimate winner for gamers and modern activists who priority the best 4K gaming immersion and future-proof AI support on a stationary rig. however, for any individual setup seeking the ultimate Ray Tracing depth, the 16GB 40-series card is the superior choice.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 11.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon PRO W7900 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+11.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-11.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $590 versus $3,500 for the Radeon PRO W7900, it costs 83% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 564% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+564%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($590) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($3,500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon PRO W7900
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Radeon PRO W7900
The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 28,211 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 11.9%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7900 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2495 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 96 (Radeon PRO W7900) with 240 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+12% | 28,211 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+25% | 6144 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS | 61.32 TFLOPS+53% |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+5% | 2495 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 192+140% |
| TMUs | 240 | 384+60% |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+150% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | 96+60% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7900 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7900 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 has 48 GB. The Radeon PRO W7900 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900) — a 71.4% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7900) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 48 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 864 GB/s+71% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 295W — a 3.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 750W (Radeon PRO W7900). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 285mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W-3% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 700W-7% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 285mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+16% | 95.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $590, while the Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999 and now averages $3500. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 83.1% less ($2910 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 8.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 560.5% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-80% | $3999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $590-83% | $3500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.5+560% | 8.1 |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 31 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | April 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #11 | #26 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon PRO W7900
