GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7900
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO W7900
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7900
Why is Radeon PRO W7900 better than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti?
Comparing the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB to the Radeon PRO W7900 highlights the difference between a mid-range consumer gaming card and a high-end professional workstation flagship. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is an efficient Ada Lovelace card built for 1080p and 1440p gaming. The Radeon PRO W7900 is AMD's top-tier professional GPU, featuring a massive 48GB of ECC VRAM and designed for the most demanding 8K editing, AI development, and workstation tasks.\n\nIn terms of raw power, the Radeon PRO W7900 is significantly more capable, with a much wider memory bus and significantly more compute units. Its 48GB of memory is its defining feature, allowing it to handle massive datasets and professional rendering projects that would crash the game-focused RTX 4060 Ti. However, for gaming, the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB holds its own with superior Ray Tracing efficiency and the widely-used DLSS ecosystem, often providing a more familiar experience for casual software.\n\nFor a professional whose livelihood depends on large-scale rendering or AI training, the Radeon PRO W7900 is the clear, albeit much more expensive, winner. For a gamer or creative who needs a reliable and efficient card with a healthy amount of VRAM for hobbyist-level projects, the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB offers excellent performance-per-dollar and modern features in a more accessible package.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W7900 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 24.5% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (48 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-24.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+24.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $380 versus $3,500 for the Radeon PRO W7900, it costs 89% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 639.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+639.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($380) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($3,500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon PRO W7900
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Radeon PRO W7900
The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 28,211 — the Radeon PRO W7900 leads by 24.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7900 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2495 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 96 (Radeon PRO W7900) with 136 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651 | 28,211+25% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 6144+41% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS | 61.32 TFLOPS+178% |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+2% | 2495 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 192+300% |
| TMUs | 136 | 384+182% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+43% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 96+182% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7900 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7900 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 has 48 GB. The Radeon PRO W7900 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900) — a 200% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7900) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 48 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 864 GB/s+200% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 295W — a 59.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 750W (Radeon PRO W7900). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-46% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-27% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+48% | 95.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $380, while the Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999 and now averages $3500. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 89.1% less ($3120 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 59.6 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 8.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 635.8% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-90% | $3999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380-89% | $3500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 59.6+636% | 8.1 |
| Codename | AD106 | Navi 31 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | April 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #59 | #26 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon PRO W7900
