GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
VS
Radeon PRO W7900

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7900

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon PRO W7900

2023Core: 1855 MHzBoost: 2495 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
100%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
96%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
95%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
94%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
93%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
93%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
92%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
91%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
90%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
90%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
89%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
88%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
88%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7900

#62
RTX A4500
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $800
176%
#63
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
MSRP: $2250|Avg: $2000
176%
#64
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1547
171%
#65
RTX A4000H
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $927
168%
#66
Radeon PRO W7800
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
154%
#67
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450
147%
#70
Radeon PRO W6800
MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249
128%
#72
Quadro P4200
MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110
123%
#74
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $4095
107%
#75
Radeon Pro Vega II
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800
101%
#76
Radeon PRO W7900
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500
100%
#77
Radeon Pro VII
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1400
99%
#78
Quadro RTX 5000
MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692
95%
#79
Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692
95%
#80
Radeon Pro W6800X
MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799
91%
#81
Tesla T10
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975
89%
#82
RTX A5000
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800
88%
#83
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200
86%
#84
Radeon PRO V710
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000
85%
#85
RTX A5500
MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200
83%
#86
Radeon Pro WX 9100
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550
79%
#87
A10G
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2000
77%
#88
Tesla T4
MSRP: $1880|Avg: $1000
77%
#89
Tesla M40 24GB
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $120
75%
#90
Quadro P5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400
72%
#91
RTX PRO 6000
MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565
71%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon PRO W7900 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 38.9% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (48 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti.

InsightGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon PRO W7900
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-38.9%)
Leading raw performance (+38.9%)
Longevity
🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm)
Ecosystem
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
🎮 High Capacity (48 GB)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $280 versus $3,500 for the Radeon PRO W7900, it costs 92% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 800% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon PRO W7900
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+800%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($280)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($3,500)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon PRO W7900

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

Radeon PRO W7900

The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 28,211 — the Radeon PRO W7900 leads by 38.9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W7900 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2495 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 96 (Radeon PRO W7900) with 152 Tensor cores.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon PRO W7900
G3D Mark Score
20,312
28,211+39%
Architecture
Ampere
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
8 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
4864
6144+26%
Compute (TFLOPS)
16.2 TFLOPS
61.32 TFLOPS+279%
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
2495 MHz+50%
ROPs
80
192+140%
TMUs
152
384+153%
L1 Cache
4.8 MB+60%
3 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
6 MB+50%
Ray Tracing Cores
38
96+153%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7900 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon PRO W7900
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2.0
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 has 48 GB. The Radeon PRO W7900 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900) — a 92.9% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7900) — the Radeon PRO W7900 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon PRO W7900
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
48 GB+500%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
864 GB/s+93%
Bus Width
256-bit
384-bit+50%
L2 Cache
4 MB
6 MB+50%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon PRO W7900
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon PRO W7900
Encoder
NVENC (Ampere)
VCN 4.0
Decoder
NVDEC (Ampere)
VCN 4.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 295W — a 38.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 750W (Radeon PRO W7900). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon PRO W7900
TDP
200W-32%
295W
Recommended PSU
600W-20%
750W
Power Connector
8-pin
2x 8-pin
Length
242mm
267mm
Height
112mm
111mm
Slots
2-33%
3
Temp (Load)
75-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
101.6+6%
95.6
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $280, while the Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999 and now averages $3500. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 92% less ($3220 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 8.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 795.1% better value. The Radeon PRO W7900 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon PRO W7900
MSRP
$399-90%
$3999
Avg Price (30d)
$280-92%
$3500
Performance per Dollar
72.5+795%
8.1
Codename
GA104
Navi 31
Release
December 1 2020
April 13 2023
Ranking
#73
#26