
Radeon RX 6950 XT vs GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Radeon RX 6950 XT
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6950 XT
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 6950 XT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6950 XT | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.7%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $600 versus $850 for the Radeon RX 6950 XT, it costs 29% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 51.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6950 XT | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+51.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($850) | ✅More affordable ($600) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6950 XT and GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Radeon RX 6950 XT
The Radeon RX 6950 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1925 MHz to 2324 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 335W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,076 points. Launch price was $1,099.

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1980 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,958 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 28,076 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER's 29,958 — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER leads by 6.7%. The Radeon RX 6950 XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (Radeon RX 6950 XT) vs 7,168 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Raw compute: 23.8 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6950 XT) vs 35.48 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Boost clocks: 2324 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 80 RT cores (Radeon RX 6950 XT) vs 56 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) vs 224.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6950 XT | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,076 | 29,958+7% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120 | 7168+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 23.8 TFLOPS | 35.48 TFLOPS+49% |
| Boost Clock | 2324 MHz | 2475 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 128+60% | 80 |
| TMUs | 320+43% | 224 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 7 MB+600% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 80+43% | 56 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smoothen motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6950 XT | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6950 XT comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has 12 GB. The Radeon RX 6950 XT offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (Radeon RX 6950 XT) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) — a 14.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 6950 XT. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 6950 XT) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6950 XT | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s+14% | 504 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6950 XT) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6950 XT | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: RDNA 2 (Radeon RX 6950 XT) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Decoder: RDNA 2 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 decode (Radeon RX 6950 XT) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6950 XT | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | RDNA 2 | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | RDNA 2 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 decode | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6950 XT draws 335W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER's 220W — a 41.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 850W (Radeon RX 6950 XT) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 267mm vs 245mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6950 XT | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 335W | 220W-34% |
| Recommended PSU | 850W | 650W-24% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 267mm | 245mm |
| Height | 120mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 83°C | 70°C-16% |
| Perf/Watt | 83.8 | 136.2+63% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6950 XT launched at $1099 MSRP and currently averages $850, while the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER launched at $599 and now averages $600. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER costs 29.4% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.0 (Radeon RX 6950 XT) vs 49.9 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER offers 51.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6950 XT | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1099 | $599-45% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $850 | $600-29% |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.0 | 49.9+51% |
| Codename | Navi 21 | AD104 |
| Release | May 10 2022 | January 8 2024 |
| Ranking | #25 | #18 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














