Radeon RX 6950 XT vs Radeon PRO W7800
Radeon RX 6950 XT
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO W7800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6950 XT
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6950 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon PRO W7800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6950 XT | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6950 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $850 versus $2,200 for the Radeon PRO W7800, it costs 61% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 167.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6950 XT | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+167.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($850) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6950 XT and Radeon PRO W7800
Radeon RX 6950 XT
The Radeon RX 6950 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1925 MHz to 2324 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 335W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,076 points. Launch price was $1,099.
Radeon PRO W7800
The Radeon PRO W7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1895 MHz to 2525 MHz. It has 4480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,180 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 28,076 and the Radeon PRO W7800 reaches 27,180 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6950 XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon PRO W7800 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,120 (Radeon RX 6950 XT) vs 4,480 (Radeon PRO W7800). Raw compute: 23.8 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6950 XT) vs 45.25 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7800). Boost clocks: 2324 MHz vs 2525 MHz. Ray tracing: 80 RT cores (Radeon RX 6950 XT) vs 70 (Radeon PRO W7800).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6950 XT | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,076+3% | 27,180 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120+14% | 4480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 23.8 TFLOPS | 45.25 TFLOPS+90% |
| Boost Clock | 2324 MHz | 2525 MHz+9% |
| ROPs | 128 | 128 |
| TMUs | 320+14% | 280 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 80+14% | 70 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6950 XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7800 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6950 XT | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6950 XT comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7800 has 32 GB. The Radeon PRO W7800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 6950 XT) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7800) — the Radeon PRO W7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6950 XT | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s | 576 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6950 XT) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6950 XT | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: RDNA 2 (Radeon RX 6950 XT) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7800). Decoder: RDNA 2 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 decode (Radeon RX 6950 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7800).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6950 XT | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | RDNA 2 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | RDNA 2 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 decode | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6950 XT draws 335W versus the Radeon PRO W7800's 260W — a 25.2% difference. The Radeon PRO W7800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 850W (Radeon RX 6950 XT) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W7800). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6950 XT | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 335W | 260W-22% |
| Recommended PSU | 850W | 650W-24% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 120mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 83°C | 80°C-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 83.8 | 104.5+25% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6950 XT launched at $1099 MSRP and currently averages $850, while the Radeon PRO W7800 launched at $2499 and now averages $2200. The Radeon RX 6950 XT costs 61.4% less ($1350 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.0 (Radeon RX 6950 XT) vs 12.4 (Radeon PRO W7800) — the Radeon RX 6950 XT offers 166.1% better value. The Radeon PRO W7800 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6950 XT | Radeon PRO W7800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1099-56% | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $850-61% | $2200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.0+166% | 12.4 |
| Codename | Navi 21 | Navi 31 |
| Release | May 10 2022 | April 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #25 | #28 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6950 XT and Radeon PRO W7800
