
Radeon RX 7600M vs Quadro RTX 3000

Radeon RX 7600M
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 3000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 3000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro RTX 3000.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600M | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 7600M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600M and Quadro RTX 3000

Radeon RX 7600M
The Radeon RX 7600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2410 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,999 points.

Quadro RTX 3000
The Quadro RTX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,858 points. Launch price was $9,999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 7600M scores 10,999 and the Quadro RTX 3000 reaches 10,858 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 7600M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Quadro RTX 3000 uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 4,608 (Quadro RTX 3000). Raw compute: 17.27 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000). Boost clocks: 2410 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 72 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 576.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600M | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,999+1% | 10,858 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 4608+157% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.27 TFLOPS+6% | 16.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2410 MHz+36% | 1770 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 112 | 288+157% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4.5 MB+800% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 72+157% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro RTX 3000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600M | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7600M comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 3000 has 6 GB. The Radeon RX 7600M offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX 3000) — the Quadro RTX 3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600M | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 12.1 (Quadro RTX 3000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600M | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+30% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 3000). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7600M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 3000).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600M | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7600M draws 90W versus the Quadro RTX 3000's 260W — a 97.1% difference. The Radeon RX 7600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 3000). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600M | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W-65% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 122.2+192% | 41.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600M | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $800 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $891 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | TU102 |
| Release | January 4 2023 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #248 | #78 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














