Radeon RX 7600M
VS
Quadro RTX 3000

Radeon RX 7600M vs Quadro RTX 3000

AMD

Radeon RX 7600M

2023Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 2410 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 3000

2018Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1770 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600M

#16
Radeon RX 7600S
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
131%
#19
Radeon RX 5600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $150
117%
#22
Radeon RX 7700
MSRP: $449|Avg: $399
112%
#25
Radeon RX 7600M XT
MSRP: $329|Avg: $300
101%
#26
Radeon RX 7600M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#28
Radeon RX 6650M XT
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#30
Radeon 8050S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
92%
#31
Radeon RX 8050S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 3000

#42
Radeon Pro W5700
MSRP: $799|Avg: $300
133%
#43
Radeon Pro W5700X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
130%
#44
RTX A4000
MSRP: $1111|Avg: $1111
129%
#45
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
MSRP: $849|Avg: $748
125%
#46
Quadro RTX 4000
MSRP: $899|Avg: $220
122%
#49
RTX 2000E Ada Generation
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
113%
#50
111%
#51
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $2015
109%
#52
RTX A1000
MSRP: $749|Avg: $500
106%
#54
Radeon Pro 5700
MSRP: $799|Avg: $250
106%
#55
Quadro P4000
MSRP: $815|Avg: $290
103%
#57
Quadro RTX 3000
MSRP: $800|Avg: $891
100%
#58
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1700
98%
#59
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
MSRP: $999|Avg: $150
94%
#60
Radeon Pro WX 8200
MSRP: $999|Avg: $350
93%
#62
RTX A4500
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $800
92%
#63
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
MSRP: $2250|Avg: $2000
91%
#64
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1547
89%
#65
RTX A4000H
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $927
87%
#66
Radeon PRO W7800
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
80%
#67
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450
76%
#70
Radeon PRO W6800
MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249
66%
#72
Quadro P4200
MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110
64%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX 7600M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro RTX 3000.

InsightRadeon RX 7600MQuadro RTX 3000
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)
Longevity
🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022))
Ecosystem
✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 7600M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600M and Quadro RTX 3000

AMD

Radeon RX 7600M

The Radeon RX 7600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2410 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,999 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 3000

The Quadro RTX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,858 points. Launch price was $9,999.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 7600M scores 10,999 and the Quadro RTX 3000 reaches 10,858 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 7600M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Quadro RTX 3000 uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 4,608 (Quadro RTX 3000). Raw compute: 17.27 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000). Boost clocks: 2410 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 72 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 576.

FeatureRadeon RX 7600MQuadro RTX 3000
G3D Mark Score
10,999+1%
10,858
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Turing
Process Node
6 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1792
4608+157%
Compute (TFLOPS)
17.27 TFLOPS+6%
16.31 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2410 MHz+36%
1770 MHz
ROPs
64
96+50%
TMUs
112
288+157%
L1 Cache
0.5 MB
4.5 MB+800%
L2 Cache
2 MB
6 MB+200%
Ray Tracing Cores
28
72+157%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro RTX 3000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureRadeon RX 7600MQuadro RTX 3000
Upscaling Tech
FSR 3 (Native)
DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation
FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver)
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 7600M comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 3000 has 6 GB. The Radeon RX 7600M offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX 3000) — the Quadro RTX 3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon RX 7600MQuadro RTX 3000
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+33%
6 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB
6 MB+200%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 12.1 (Quadro RTX 3000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon RX 7600MQuadro RTX 3000
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12.1
Vulkan
1.3+30%
1.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 3000). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7600M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 3000).

FeatureRadeon RX 7600MQuadro RTX 3000
Encoder
VCN 4.0
7th Gen NVENC
Decoder
VCN 4.0
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 7600M draws 90W versus the Quadro RTX 3000's 260W — a 97.1% difference. The Radeon RX 7600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 3000). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon RX 7600MQuadro RTX 3000
TDP
90W-65%
260W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
122.2+192%
41.8
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 7600M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).

FeatureRadeon RX 7600MQuadro RTX 3000
MSRP
$800
Avg Price (30d)
$891
Codename
Navi 33
TU102
Release
January 4 2023
August 13 2018
Ranking
#248
#78