Radeon RX 7600M
VS
Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

Radeon RX 7600M vs Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

AMD

Radeon RX 7600M

2023Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 2410 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

2019Core: 945 MHzBoost: 1380 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600M

#16
Radeon RX 7600S
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
131%
#19
Radeon RX 5600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $150
117%
#22
Radeon RX 7700
MSRP: $449|Avg: $399
112%
#25
Radeon RX 7600M XT
MSRP: $329|Avg: $300
101%
#26
Radeon RX 7600M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#28
Radeon RX 6650M XT
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#30
Radeon 8050S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
92%
#31
Radeon RX 8050S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

#26
Radeon Pro Vega 48
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
139%
#27
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
MSRP: $500|Avg: $280
138%
#28
Quadro P5200
MSRP: $500|Avg: $240
129%
#29
Radeon PRO W7700
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
128%
#30
Radeon PRO W6600
MSRP: $649|Avg: $649
127%
#32
Radeon AI PRO R9700
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1450
122%
#33
Radeon Pro Vega 64
MSRP: $599|Avg: $114
119%
#38
Radeon PRO W6600X
MSRP: $699|Avg: $699
104%
#41
Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
100%
#42
Radeon Pro W5700
MSRP: $799|Avg: $300
100%
#43
Radeon Pro W5700X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
98%
#44
RTX A4000
MSRP: $1111|Avg: $1111
97%
#45
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
MSRP: $849|Avg: $748
94%
#46
Quadro RTX 4000
MSRP: $899|Avg: $220
92%
#49
RTX 2000E Ada Generation
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
85%
#50
83%
#51
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $2015
82%
#52
RTX A1000
MSRP: $749|Avg: $500
80%
#54
Radeon Pro 5700
MSRP: $799|Avg: $250
80%
#55
Quadro P4000
MSRP: $815|Avg: $290
78%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX 7600M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel).

InsightRadeon RX 7600MQuadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.6%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%)
Longevity
🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm)
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
🎮 High Capacity (4 GB)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 7600M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600M and Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

AMD

Radeon RX 7600M

The Radeon RX 7600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2410 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,999 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 945 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,829 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 7600M scores 10,999 and the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) reaches 10,829 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 7600M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 2,304 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 17.27 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 6.359 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 2410 MHz vs 1380 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 36 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs 288.

FeatureRadeon RX 7600MQuadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score
10,999+2%
10,829
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Turing
Process Node
6 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1792
2304+29%
Compute (TFLOPS)
17.27 TFLOPS+172%
6.359 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2410 MHz+75%
1380 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
112
144+29%
L1 Cache
0.5 MB
2.3 MB+360%
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
Ray Tracing Cores
28
36+29%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureRadeon RX 7600MQuadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech
FSR 3 (Native)
DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation
FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver)
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 7600M comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 7600M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) — the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon RX 7600MQuadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 12.1 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon RX 7600MQuadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12.1
Vulkan
1.3+30%
1.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7600M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)).

FeatureRadeon RX 7600MQuadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
Encoder
VCN 4.0
7th Gen NVENC
Decoder
VCN 4.0
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 7600M draws 90W versus the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)'s 80W — a 11.8% difference. The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon RX 7600MQuadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
TDP
90W
80W-11%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
122.2
135.4+11%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 7600M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).

FeatureRadeon RX 7600MQuadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
MSRP
$600
Avg Price (30d)
$600
Codename
Navi 33
TU106
Release
January 4 2023
May 27 2019
Ranking
#248
#261