
Radeon RX 7900 XT vs RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

Radeon RX 7900 XT
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7900 XT
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.8% higher G3D Mark score and 140% more VRAM (48 GB vs 20 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 7900 XT.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7900 XT | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (20 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (276mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7900 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $630 versus $4,799 for the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, it costs 87% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 613.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7900 XT | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+613.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($630) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($4,799) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7900 XT and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

Radeon RX 7900 XT
The Radeon RX 7900 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 3 2022. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1387 MHz to 2394 MHz. It has 5376 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,996 points. Launch price was $899.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 2377 MHz. It has 14080 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 110 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,968 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 7900 XT scores 28,996 versus the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell's 30,968 — the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell leads by 6.8%. The Radeon RX 7900 XT is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 5,376 (Radeon RX 7900 XT) vs 14,080 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 51.48 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900 XT) vs 66.94 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 2394 MHz vs 2377 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (Radeon RX 7900 XT) vs 110 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) vs 440.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900 XT | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,996 | 30,968+7% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5376 | 14080+162% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 51.48 TFLOPS | 66.94 TFLOPS+30% |
| Boost Clock | 2394 MHz | 2377 MHz |
| ROPs | 192+9% | 176 |
| TMUs | 336 | 440+31% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 13.8 MB+360% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 96 MB+1500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 84 | 110+31% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7900 XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900 XT | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7900 XT comes with 20 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has 48 GB. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell offers 140% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 800 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900 XT) vs 1024 GB/s (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) — a 28% advantage for the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell. Bus width: 320-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900 XT) vs 96 MB (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900 XT | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 20 GB | 48 GB+140% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 800 GB/s | 1024 GB/s+28% |
| Bus Width | 320-bit | 384-bit+20% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 96 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7900 XT) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900 XT | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7900 XT) vs NVENC (9th Gen) (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC (6th Gen). Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX 7900 XT) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900 XT | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC (9th Gen) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | NVDEC (6th Gen) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7900 XT draws 300W versus the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell's 300W — a 0% difference. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon RX 7900 XT) vs 650W (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 276mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900 XT | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 276mm | 267mm |
| Height | 110mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 96.7 | 103.2+7% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7900 XT launched at $899 MSRP and currently averages $630, while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell launched at $6999 and now averages $4799. The Radeon RX 7900 XT costs 86.9% less ($4169 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 46.0 (Radeon RX 7900 XT) vs 6.5 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) — the Radeon RX 7900 XT offers 607.7% better value. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900 XT | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899-87% | $6999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $630-87% | $4799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.0+608% | 6.5 |
| Codename | Navi 31 | GB202 |
| Release | November 3 2022 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #21 | #13 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















