CPU
GPU
Radeon RX 7900M
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7900M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 7900M.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7900M | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7900M and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Radeon RX 7900M
The Radeon RX 7900M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 19 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2090 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,385 points.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,713 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 7900M scores 22,385 and the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB reaches 22,713 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 7900M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,608 (Radeon RX 7900M) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Raw compute: 38.52 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900M) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Boost clocks: 2090 MHz vs 2535 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Radeon RX 7900M) vs 34 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 136.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900M | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,385 | 22,713+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+6% | 4352 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 38.52 TFLOPS+75% | 22.06 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2090 MHz | 2535 MHz+21% |
| ROPs | 192+300% | 48 |
| TMUs | 288+112% | 136 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 4.3 MB+43% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 32 MB+433% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+112% | 34 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smoothen motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900M | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 16 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900M) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — a 100% advantage for the Radeon RX 7900M. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900M) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900M | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s+100% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 32 MB+433% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7900M) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900M | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7900M) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7900M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900M | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7900M draws 180W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB's 165W — a 8.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 330W (Radeon RX 7900M) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Power connectors: Mobile vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 0mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2.2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900M | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 165W-8% |
| Recommended PSU | 330W-40% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 0mm | 240mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2.2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 65°C-24% |
| Perf/Watt | 124.4 | 137.7+11% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 7900M and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
