Radeon RX 7900M
RTX A6000
Radeon RX 7900M vs RTX A6000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon RX 7900M vs RTX A6000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon RX 7900M vs RTX A6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon RX 7900M
2023Why buy it
- ✅1.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 230W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
RTX A6000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 16 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Radeon RX 7900M is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌27.8% higher power demand at 230W vs 180W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 7900M vs RTX A6000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon RX 7900M
The Radeon RX 7900M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 19 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2090 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,385 points.
RTX A6000
The RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,815 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 7900M scores 22,385 and the RTX A6000 reaches 22,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 7900M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX A6000 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Radeon RX 7900M) vs 8,192 (RTX A6000). Raw compute: 38.52 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900M) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTX A6000). Boost clocks: 2090 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Radeon RX 7900M) vs 64 (RTX A6000) vs 256.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900M | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,385 | 22,815+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608 | 8192+78% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 38.52 TFLOPS+39% | 27.77 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2090 MHz+23% | 1695 MHz |
| ROPs | 192+100% | 96 |
| TMUs | 288+13% | 256 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 8 MB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+13% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 7900M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX A6000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX A6000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 7900M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900M | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7900M has 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A6000 carries 48 GB. RTX A6000 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900M) vs 768 GB/s (RTX A6000) — a 33.3% advantage for the RTX A6000. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon RX 7900M and 384-bit on the RTX A6000.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900M | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 48 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s | 768 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7900M) vs 12.1 (RTX A6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900M | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7900M) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A6000). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7900M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A6000).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900M | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7900M draws 180W versus the RTX A6000's 230W — a 24.4% difference. The Radeon RX 7900M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 330W (Radeon RX 7900M) vs 500W (RTX A6000). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin EPS. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900M | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-22% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 330W-34% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin EPS |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 124.4+25% | 99.2 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon RX 7900M (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7900M | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $4649 |
| Codename | Navi 31 | GA102 |
| Release | October 19 2023 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #62 | #53 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 7900M and RTX A6000
