GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs Radeon RX 7900M
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 7900M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7900M
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB better than Radeon RX 7900M?
The matchup between the mobile flagship Radeon RX 7900M and the desktop enthusiast GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB highlights the impressive growth of laptop graphical power. The RX 7900M, built on the RDNA 3 architecture, is a mobile beast that can actually outperform the 16GB desktop card by 10-20% in many raw rasterization benchmarks. This makes it a rare mobile chip capable of beating high-quality desktop mid-range hardware.
Technically, the RX 7900M features 16GB of VRAM and a much wider memory bus compared to the 128-bit interface of the RTX 4060 Ti. This extra bandwidth is critical for 1440p and 4K gaming stability. While the NVIDIA card has the benefit of DLSS 3 Frame Generation, the RX 7900M’s superior raw muscle and massive infinity cache allow it to maintain higher frame rates in traditional rendering. However, it does consume significantly more power than the efficient 40-series desktop card.
The Radeon RX 7900M is the winner for users who want the absolute highest raw performance in a portable machine. It is a world-class mobile GPU that rivals desktop enthusiasts. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the winner for desktop builders who prioritize energy efficiency, lower temperatures, and the latest in AI-driven upscaling. For anyone seeking the fastest overall engine between these two, the flagship Radeon mobile chip is the surprising and definitive winner.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 7900M.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB and Radeon RX 7900M
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,713 points. Launch price was $499.
Radeon RX 7900M
The Radeon RX 7900M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 19 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2090 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,385 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB scores 22,713 and the Radeon RX 7900M reaches 22,385 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7900M uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 4,608 (Radeon RX 7900M). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 38.52 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900M). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2090 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 72 (Radeon RX 7900M) with 136 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,713+1% | 22,385 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 4608+6% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS | 38.52 TFLOPS+75% |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+21% | 2090 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 192+300% |
| TMUs | 136 | 288+112% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+43% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 72+112% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB uses DLSS 3 (AI-based) which is hardware-accelerated on Tensor Cores, often providing superior image quality. The Radeon RX 7900M utilizes FSR 3 & AFMF, which is more open but driver-based. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7900M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 16 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900M) — a 100% advantage for the Radeon RX 7900M. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 576 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7900M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7900M). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7900M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB draws 165W versus the Radeon RX 7900M's 180W — a 8.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 330W (Radeon RX 7900M). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs Mobile. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2.2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W-8% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 330W-40% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | Mobile |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2.2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-24% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 137.7+11% | 124.4 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB and Radeon RX 7900M
