
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

Radeon RX 7700 XT
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs Radeon RX 7700 XT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs Radeon RX 7700 XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs Radeon RX 7700 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
2023Why buy it
- ✅16.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 245W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌11.1% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 45.5 vs 50.5 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Radeon RX 7700 XT
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.5 vs 45.5 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌48.5% higher power demand at 245W vs 165W.
- ❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs Radeon RX 7700 XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,713 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon RX 7700 XT
The Radeon RX 7700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 25 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1435 MHz to 2544 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,654 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB scores 22,713 and the Radeon RX 7700 XT reaches 22,654 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 7700 XT uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 3,456 (Radeon RX 7700 XT). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 35.17 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7700 XT). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2544 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 54 (Radeon RX 7700 XT) with 136 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,713 | 22,654 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+26% | 3456 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS | 35.17 TFLOPS+59% |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 2544 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 136 | 216+59% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+473% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 54+59% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation, but they get there through different ecosystems. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 7700 XT relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can help smooth out supported games, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 7700 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7700 XT carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 7700 XT) — a 50% advantage for the Radeon RX 7700 XT. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB and 192-bit on the Radeon RX 7700 XT. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7700 XT) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 432 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7700 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7700 XT). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7700 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB draws 165W versus the Radeon RX 7700 XT's 245W — a 39% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 700W (Radeon RX 7700 XT). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2.2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 55°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W-33% | 245W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-21% | 700W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2.2 | 2-9% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | 55°C-15% |
| Perf/Watt | 137.7+49% | 92.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB came in at $499, while the Radeon RX 7700 XT launched at $449. On MSRP, Radeon RX 7700 XT was 10% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.5 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 50.5 (Radeon RX 7700 XT) — the Radeon RX 7700 XT offers 11% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $449-10% |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.5 | 50.5+11% |
| Codename | AD106 | Navi 32 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 25 2023 |
| Ranking | #56 | #58 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














