
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

RTX A5000
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs RTX A5000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs RTX A5000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs RTX A5000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,222 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 638% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.5 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 230W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 256), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX A5000
2021Why buy it
- ✅5.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅88.2% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (256 vs 136).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌645.7% HIGHER MSRP$3,721 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.2 vs 45.5 G3D/$ ($3,721 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌39.4% higher power demand at 230W vs 165W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs RTX A5000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,713 points. Launch price was $499.

RTX A5000
The RTX A5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,951 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB scores 22,713 and the RTX A5000 reaches 22,951 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A5000 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 8,192 (RTX A5000). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTX A5000). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 64 (RTX A5000) with 136 Tensor cores vs 256.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,713 | 22,951+1% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 8192+88% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS | 27.77 TFLOPS+26% |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+50% | 1695 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 136 | 256+88% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 8 MB+86% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 64+88% |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 256+88% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX A5000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX A5000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A5000 carries 24 GB. RTX A5000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 768 GB/s (RTX A5000) — a 166.7% advantage for the RTX A5000. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB and 384-bit on the RTX A5000. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 6 MB (RTX A5000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 24 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 768 GB/s+167% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 12.1 (RTX A5000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A5000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A5000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB draws 165W versus the RTX A5000's 230W — a 32.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 650W (RTX A5000). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2.2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W-28% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2.2 | 2-9% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-19% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 137.7+38% | 99.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB came in at $499, while the RTX A5000 launched at $3721. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB was 86.6% cheaper ($3222 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.5 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 6.2 (RTX A5000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB offers 633.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-87% | $3721 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.5+634% | 6.2 |
| Codename | AD106 | GA102 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #56 | #53 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














