G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs Quadro RTX A6000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs Quadro RTX A6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,150 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
✅Delivers 828.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.5 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 165W instead of 300W, a 135W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX A6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

Quadro RTX A6000

2020

Why buy it

✅19.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅147.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 136).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 16 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌
831.7% HIGHER MSRP
$4,649 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 45.5 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
❌81.8% higher power demand at 300W vs 165W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro RTX A6000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 19.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (22,798 vs 22,713), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Quadro RTX A6000 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 8nm, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2020. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $4,150 cheaper on MSRP at $499 vs $4,649, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 828.2% (45.5 vs 4.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro RTX A6000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs Quadro RTX A6000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,713 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro RTX A6000

The Quadro RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,798 points. Launch price was $4,649.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB scores 22,713 and the Quadro RTX A6000 reaches 22,798 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX A6000 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 10,752 (Quadro RTX A6000). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 38.71 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX A6000). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1800 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 84 (Quadro RTX A6000) with 136 Tensor cores vs 336.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB	Quadro RTX A6000
G3D Mark Score	22,713	22,798
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Ampere
Process Node	5 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	4352	10752+147%
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS	38.71 TFLOPS+75%
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+41%	1800 MHz
ROPs	48	112+133%
TMUs	136	336+147%
L1 Cache	4.3 MB	10.5 MB+144%
L2 Cache	32 MB+433%	6 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	34	84+147%
Tensor Cores	136	336+147%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro RTX A6000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX A6000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB	Quadro RTX A6000
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX A6000 carries 48 GB. Quadro RTX A6000 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX A6000) — a 166.7% advantage for the Quadro RTX A6000. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB and 384-bit on the Quadro RTX A6000. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX A6000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB	Quadro RTX A6000
VRAM Capacity	16 GB	48 GB+200%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s	768 GB/s+167%
Bus Width	128-bit	384-bit+200%
L2 Cache	32 MB+433%	6 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX A6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB	Quadro RTX A6000
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX A6000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Quadro RTX A6000).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB	Quadro RTX A6000
Encoder	NVENC 8th gen	NVENC (7th Gen)
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	NVDEC (5th Gen)
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB draws 165W versus the Quadro RTX A6000's 300W — a 58.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 500W (Quadro RTX A6000). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 8-pin EPS. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2.2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB	Quadro RTX A6000
TDP	165W-45%	300W
Recommended PSU	550W	500W-9%
Power Connector	16-pin (12VHPWR)	8-pin EPS
Length	240mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2.2	2-9%
Temp (Load)	65°C-24%	85
Perf/Watt	137.7+81%	76.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB came in at $499, while the Quadro RTX A6000 launched at $4649. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB was 89.3% cheaper ($4150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.5 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 4.9 (Quadro RTX A6000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB offers 828.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB (2023 vs 2020).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB	Quadro RTX A6000
MSRP	$499-89%	$4649
Performance per Dollar	45.5+829%	4.9
Codename	AD106	GA102
Release	May 18 2023	October 5 2020
Ranking	#56	#54

Search GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB on Amazon

Search Quadro RTX A6000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.