GeForce RTX 3050 8GB vs Quadro RTX A6000
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Quadro RTX A6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX A6000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro RTX A6000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 81.9% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (48 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-81.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+81.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $209 versus $3,500 for the Quadro RTX A6000, it costs 94% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 820.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+820.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($209) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($3,500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and Quadro RTX A6000
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Quadro RTX A6000
The Quadro RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,798 points. Launch price was $4,649.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB scores 12,535 versus the Quadro RTX A6000's 22,798 — the Quadro RTX A6000 leads by 81.9%. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro RTX A6000 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 10,752 (Quadro RTX A6000). Raw compute: 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 38.71 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX A6000). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1800 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 84 (Quadro RTX A6000) with 80 Tensor cores vs 336.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,535 | 22,798+82% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 10752+320% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.098 TFLOPS | 38.71 TFLOPS+325% |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 1800 MHz+1% |
| ROPs | 32 | 112+250% |
| TMUs | 80 | 336+320% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 10.5 MB+320% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 84+320% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 336+320% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro RTX A6000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX A6000 has 48 GB. The Quadro RTX A6000 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX A6000) — a 242.9% advantage for the Quadro RTX A6000. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX A6000) — the Quadro RTX A6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 48 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 768 GB/s+243% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX A6000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX A6000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Quadro RTX A6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB draws 130W versus the Quadro RTX A6000's 300W — a 79.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 500W (Quadro RTX A6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin EPS. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 66°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-57% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin EPS |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 66°C-22% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 96.4+27% | 76.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $209, while the Quadro RTX A6000 launched at $4649 and now averages $3500. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB costs 94% less ($3291 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 6.5 (Quadro RTX A6000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 823.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-95% | $4649 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $209-94% | $3500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.0+823% | 6.5 |
| Codename | GA106 | GA102 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | October 5 2020 |
| Ranking | #211 | #54 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and Quadro RTX A6000
