GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs Radeon PRO W7700
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO W7700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7700
Why is Radeon PRO W7700 better than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB?
The matchup between the professional Radeon PRO W7700 and the enthusiast GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB reveals the distance between workstation precision and high-value gaming power. Both are powerful cards, but the Radeon PRO W7700, built on the RDNA 3 architecture, offers roughly 25-30% more raw compute muscle and professional certified drivers for enterprise-grade 3D projects.
Technically, the Radeon PRO W7700 features specialized AI accelerators and hardware-based pro encoding, making it a robust engine for video production and engineering. While the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB provides incredible value and mature DLSS features for stationary gaming, the PRO W7700 offers superior stability for mission-critical software. Moving to a professional Radeon engine is a transformative upgrade for users seeking a world-class balance of workstation muscle and modern efficiency in 2026.
The Radeon PRO W7700 is the winner for professional designers and engineers who need uncompromised stability and workstation certification for high-end projects. it represents a world-class industrial tool. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB remains the winner for modern activists and enthusiasts who demand the absolute best AI feature set for high-fidelity 1440p gaming. for any consumer rig requiring uncompromised speed, the 16GB 40-series card is the definitive and superior choice.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W7700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $449 versus $999 for the Radeon PRO W7700, it costs 55% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 119.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+119.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($449) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($999) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB and Radeon PRO W7700
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,713 points. Launch price was $499.
Radeon PRO W7700
The Radeon PRO W7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,062 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB scores 22,713 and the Radeon PRO W7700 reaches 23,062 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7700 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 3,072 (Radeon PRO W7700). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 31.95 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7700). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 48 (Radeon PRO W7700) with 136 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,713 | 23,062+2% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+42% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS | 31.95 TFLOPS+45% |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 2600 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 136 | 192+41% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+473% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 48+41% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 16 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7700) — a 50% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7700. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7700) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 432 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7700). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB draws 165W versus the Radeon PRO W7700's 190W — a 14.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 550W (Radeon PRO W7700). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2.2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W-13% | 190W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 550W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2.2 | 2-9% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-19% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 137.7+13% | 121.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $449, while the Radeon PRO W7700 launched at $999 and now averages $999. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB costs 55.1% less ($550 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 50.6 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 23.1 (Radeon PRO W7700) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB offers 119% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-50% | $999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $449-55% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.6+119% | 23.1 |
| Codename | AD106 | Navi 32 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | November 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #56 | #52 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB and Radeon PRO W7700
