Quadro RTX A6000 vs Radeon RX 7900M
Quadro RTX A6000
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 7900M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX A6000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7900M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro RTX A6000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (48 GB vs 16 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 7900M.
| Insight | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro RTX A6000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX A6000 and Radeon RX 7900M
Quadro RTX A6000
The Quadro RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,798 points. Launch price was $4,649.
Radeon RX 7900M
The Radeon RX 7900M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 19 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2090 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,385 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX A6000 scores 22,798 and the Radeon RX 7900M reaches 22,385 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX A6000 is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 7900M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 10,752 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 4,608 (Radeon RX 7900M). Raw compute: 38.71 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 38.52 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900M). Boost clocks: 1800 MHz vs 2090 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 72 (Radeon RX 7900M) with 336 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,798+2% | 22,385 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 10752+133% | 4608 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 38.71 TFLOPS | 38.52 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1800 MHz | 2090 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 112 | 192+71% |
| TMUs | 336+17% | 288 |
| L1 Cache | 10.5 MB+250% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 84+17% | 72 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7900M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro RTX A6000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX A6000 comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7900M has 16 GB. The Quadro RTX A6000 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900M) — a 33.3% advantage for the Quadro RTX A6000. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+200% | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 768 GB/s+33% | 576 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7900M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX A6000) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7900M). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7900M).
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX A6000 draws 300W versus the Radeon RX 7900M's 180W — a 50% difference. The Radeon RX 7900M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 330W (Radeon RX 7900M). Power connectors: 8-pin EPS vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 180W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 330W-34% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin EPS | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 76.0 | 124.4+64% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7900M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4649 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3500 | — |
| Codename | GA102 | Navi 31 |
| Release | October 5 2020 | October 19 2023 |
| Ranking | #54 | #62 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro RTX A6000 and Radeon RX 7900M
