Quadro RTX A6000
Radeon RX 7900M
Quadro RTX A6000 vs Radeon RX 7900M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX A6000 vs Radeon RX 7900M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX A6000 vs Radeon RX 7900M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX A6000
2020Why buy it
- ✅10.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 16 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Radeon RX 7900M is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 180W.
Radeon RX 7900M
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 300W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX A6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX A6000 vs Radeon RX 7900M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro RTX A6000
The Quadro RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,798 points. Launch price was $4,649.
Radeon RX 7900M
The Radeon RX 7900M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 19 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2090 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,385 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX A6000 scores 22,798 and the Radeon RX 7900M reaches 22,385 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX A6000 is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 7900M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 10,752 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 4,608 (Radeon RX 7900M). Raw compute: 38.71 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 38.52 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900M). Boost clocks: 1800 MHz vs 2090 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 72 (Radeon RX 7900M) with 336 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,798+2% | 22,385 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 10752+133% | 4608 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 38.71 TFLOPS | 38.52 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1800 MHz | 2090 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 112 | 192+71% |
| TMUs | 336+17% | 288 |
| L1 Cache | 10.5 MB+250% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 84+17% | 72 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 7900M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro RTX A6000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX A6000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 7900M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX A6000 has 48 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7900M carries 16 GB. Quadro RTX A6000 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900M) — a 33.3% advantage for the Quadro RTX A6000. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro RTX A6000 and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 7900M.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+200% | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 768 GB/s+33% | 576 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7900M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX A6000) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7900M). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7900M).
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX A6000 draws 300W versus the Radeon RX 7900M's 180W — a 50% difference. The Radeon RX 7900M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 330W (Radeon RX 7900M). Power connectors: 8-pin EPS vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 180W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 330W-34% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin EPS | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 76.0 | 124.4+64% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon RX 7900M (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4649 | — |
| Codename | GA102 | Navi 31 |
| Release | October 5 2020 | October 19 2023 |
| Ranking | #54 | #62 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro RTX A6000 and Radeon RX 7900M
