Quadro RTX A6000 vs RTX A6000
Quadro RTX A6000
Popular choices:
RTX A6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX A6000
Performance Per Dollar RTX A6000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A6000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro RTX A6000.
| Insight | Quadro RTX A6000 | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The RTX A6000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $3,500 (vs $3,500), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 0.1% better value per dollar than the Quadro RTX A6000.
| Insight | Quadro RTX A6000 | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX A6000 and RTX A6000
Quadro RTX A6000
The Quadro RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,798 points. Launch price was $4,649.
RTX A6000
The RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,815 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX A6000 scores 22,798 and the RTX A6000 reaches 22,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX A6000 is built on Ampere while the RTX A6000 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 10,752 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 8,192 (RTX A6000). Raw compute: 38.71 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTX A6000). Boost clocks: 1800 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 64 (RTX A6000) with 336 Tensor cores vs 256.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,798 | 22,815 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 10752+31% | 8192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 38.71 TFLOPS+39% | 27.77 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1800 MHz+6% | 1695 MHz |
| ROPs | 112+17% | 96 |
| TMUs | 336+31% | 256 |
| L1 Cache | 10.5 MB+31% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 84+31% | 64 |
| Tensor Cores | 336+31% | 256 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 48 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 384-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB | 48 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 768 GB/s | 768 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 12.1 (RTX A6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A6000). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A6000).
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX A6000 draws 300W versus the RTX A6000's 230W — a 26.4% difference. The RTX A6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 500W (RTX A6000). Power connectors: 8-pin EPS vs 8-pin EPS. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 230W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin EPS | 8-pin EPS |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 76.0 | 99.2+31% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX A6000 launched at $4649 MSRP and currently averages $3500, while the RTX A6000 launched at $4649 and now averages $3500. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.5 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 6.5 (RTX A6000) — the RTX A6000 offers 0% better value. The RTX A6000 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4649 | $4649 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3500 | $3500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Codename | GA102 | GA102 |
| Release | October 5 2020 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #54 | #53 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro RTX A6000 and RTX A6000
