Quadro RTX A6000 vs RTX A6000

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX A6000

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1800 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

RTX A6000

2021Core: 1170 MHzBoost: 1695 MHz

Quadro RTX A6000 vs RTX A6000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro RTX A6000 vs RTX A6000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro RTX A6000 vs RTX A6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro RTX A6000

2020

Why buy it

  • 12.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 31.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 256).

Trade-offs

  • RTX A6000 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • 30.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 230W.

RTX A6000

2021

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 230W instead of 300W, a 70W reduction.
  • More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX A6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (256 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro RTX A6000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 12.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward RTX A6000 instead at 22,815 vs 22,798, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RTX A6000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2021 generation instead of 2020. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RTX A6000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $4,649 vs $4,649, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 0.1% (4.9 vs 4.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro RTX A6000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro RTX A6000 vs RTX A6000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX A6000

The Quadro RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,798 points. Launch price was $4,649.

NVIDIA

RTX A6000

The RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,815 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX A6000 scores 22,798 and the RTX A6000 reaches 22,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX A6000 is built on Ampere while the RTX A6000 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 10,752 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 8,192 (RTX A6000). Raw compute: 38.71 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTX A6000). Boost clocks: 1800 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 64 (RTX A6000) with 336 Tensor cores vs 256.

FeatureQuadro RTX A6000RTX A6000
G3D Mark Score
22,798
22,815
Architecture
Ampere
Ampere
Process Node
8 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
10752+31%
8192
Compute (TFLOPS)
38.71 TFLOPS+39%
27.77 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1800 MHz+6%
1695 MHz
ROPs
112+17%
96
TMUs
336+31%
256
L1 Cache
10.5 MB+31%
8 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
6 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
84+31%
64
Tensor Cores
336+31%
256

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro RTX A6000RTX A6000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 48 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro RTX A6000 and 384-bit on the RTX A6000.

FeatureQuadro RTX A6000RTX A6000
VRAM Capacity
48 GB
48 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
768 GB/s
768 GB/s
Bus Width
384-bit
384-bit
L2 Cache
6 MB
6 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 12.1 (RTX A6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro RTX A6000RTX A6000
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.1
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A6000). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A6000).

FeatureQuadro RTX A6000RTX A6000
Encoder
NVENC (7th Gen)
7th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder
NVDEC (5th Gen)
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX A6000 draws 300W versus the RTX A6000's 230W — a 26.4% difference. The RTX A6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 500W (RTX A6000). Power connectors: 8-pin EPS vs 8-pin EPS. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.

FeatureQuadro RTX A6000RTX A6000
TDP
300W
230W-23%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
8-pin EPS
8-pin EPS
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
76.0
99.2+31%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro RTX A6000 came in at $4649, while the RTX A6000 launched at $4649. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.9 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 4.9 (RTX A6000) — the RTX A6000 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is RTX A6000 (2021 vs 2020).

FeatureQuadro RTX A6000RTX A6000
MSRP
$4649
$4649
Performance per Dollar
4.9
4.9
Codename
GA102
GA102
Release
October 5 2020
April 12 2021
Ranking
#54
#53

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.