G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro RTX A6000 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro RTX A6000 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro RTX A6000

2020

Why buy it

✅71.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅75% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 192).
✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌
132.6% HIGHER MSRP
$4,649 MSRPvs$1,999 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
❌328.6% higher power demand at 300W vs 70W.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,650 less on MSRP ($1,999 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
✅Delivers 145.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.0 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 70W instead of 300W, a 230W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX A6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro RTX A6000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 71.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward RTX 4000 Ada Generation instead at 24,046 vs 22,798, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Quadro RTX A6000 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 8nm, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2020. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RTX 4000 Ada Generation makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,650 cheaper on MSRP at $1,999 vs $4,649, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 145.3% (12.0 vs 4.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro RTX A6000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro RTX A6000 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro RTX A6000

The Quadro RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,798 points. Launch price was $4,649.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro RTX A6000 scores 22,798 versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 24,046 — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation leads by 5.5%. The Quadro RTX A6000 is built on Ampere while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 10,752 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 38.71 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1800 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) with 336 Tensor cores vs 192.

Feature	Quadro RTX A6000	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
G3D Mark Score	22,798	24,046+5%
Architecture	Ampere	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	8 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	10752+75%	6144
Compute (TFLOPS)	38.71 TFLOPS+45%	26.73 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1800 MHz+15%	1560 MHz
ROPs	112+75%	64
TMUs	336+75%	192
L1 Cache	10.5 MB+75%	6 MB
L2 Cache	6 MB	48 MB+700%
Ray Tracing Cores	84+75%	48
Tensor Cores	336+75%	192

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro RTX A6000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the Quadro RTX A6000 is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	Quadro RTX A6000	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX A6000 has 48 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation carries 2 GB. Quadro RTX A6000 gives you 2300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — a 113.3% advantage for the Quadro RTX A6000. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro RTX A6000 and 160-bit on the RTX 4000 Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro RTX A6000	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
VRAM Capacity	48 GB+2300%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6 ECC
Memory Bandwidth	768 GB/s+113%	360 GB/s
Bus Width	384-bit+140%	160-bit
L2 Cache	6 MB	48 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro RTX A6000	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation).

Feature	Quadro RTX A6000	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Encoder	NVENC (7th Gen)	8th Gen NVENC (3x)
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX A6000 draws 300W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 124.3% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin EPS vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.

Feature	Quadro RTX A6000	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
TDP	300W	70W-77%
Recommended PSU	500W-33%	750W
Power Connector	8-pin EPS	1x 8-pin
Length	267mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	85	80°C-6%
Perf/Watt	76.0	343.5+352%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro RTX A6000 came in at $4649, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation launched at $1999. On MSRP, RTX 4000 Ada Generation was 57% cheaper ($2650 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.9 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 12.0 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation offers 144.9% better value. The newer card here is RTX 4000 Ada Generation (2023 vs 2020).

Feature	Quadro RTX A6000	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
MSRP	$4649	$1999-57%
Performance per Dollar	4.9	12.0+145%
Codename	GA102	AD104
Release	October 5 2020	August 9 2023
Ranking	#54	#47

Search Quadro RTX A6000 on Amazon

Search RTX 4000 Ada Generation on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.