
Quadro RTX A6000 vs Radeon RX 7700 XT

Quadro RTX A6000
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7700 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX A6000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7700 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro RTX A6000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (48 GB vs 12 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 7700 XT.
| Insight | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7700 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $380 versus $3,500 for the Quadro RTX A6000, it costs 89% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 815.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+815.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($3,500) | ✅More affordable ($380) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX A6000 and Radeon RX 7700 XT

Quadro RTX A6000
The Quadro RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,798 points. Launch price was $4,649.

Radeon RX 7700 XT
The Radeon RX 7700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 25 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1435 MHz to 2544 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,654 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX A6000 scores 22,798 and the Radeon RX 7700 XT reaches 22,654 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX A6000 is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 7700 XT uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 10,752 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 3,456 (Radeon RX 7700 XT). Raw compute: 38.71 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 35.17 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7700 XT). Boost clocks: 1800 MHz vs 2544 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 54 (Radeon RX 7700 XT) with 336 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,798 | 22,654 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 10752+211% | 3456 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 38.71 TFLOPS+10% | 35.17 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1800 MHz | 2544 MHz+41% |
| ROPs | 112+17% | 96 |
| TMUs | 336+56% | 216 |
| L1 Cache | 10.5 MB+1300% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 84+56% | 54 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7700 XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro RTX A6000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX A6000 comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7700 XT has 12 GB. The Quadro RTX A6000 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 7700 XT) — a 77.8% advantage for the Quadro RTX A6000. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7700 XT) — the Quadro RTX A6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+300% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 768 GB/s+78% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7700 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX A6000) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7700 XT). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7700 XT).
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX A6000 draws 300W versus the Radeon RX 7700 XT's 245W — a 20.2% difference. The Radeon RX 7700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 700W (Radeon RX 7700 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin EPS vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 55°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 245W-18% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-29% | 700W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin EPS | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 55°C-35% |
| Perf/Watt | 76.0 | 92.5+22% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX A6000 launched at $4649 MSRP and currently averages $3500, while the Radeon RX 7700 XT launched at $449 and now averages $380. The Radeon RX 7700 XT costs 89.1% less ($3120 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.5 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 59.6 (Radeon RX 7700 XT) — the Radeon RX 7700 XT offers 816.9% better value. The Radeon RX 7700 XT is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4649 | $449-90% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3500 | $380-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.5 | 59.6+817% |
| Codename | GA102 | Navi 32 |
| Release | October 5 2020 | August 25 2023 |
| Ranking | #54 | #58 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














