Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
VS
GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB vs GeForce GTX 1650

AMD

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

2025Core: 1700 MHzBoost: 3130 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

#17
Radeon RX 6700
MSRP: $379|Avg: $300
108%
#18
Radeon RX 6600 XT
MSRP: $379|Avg: $170
106%
#19
Radeon RX590 GME
MSRP: $173|Avg: $115
106%
#20
Radeon RX 6650 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $230
105%
#21
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
104%
#22
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP: $169|Avg: $179
103%
#23
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
MSRP: $249|Avg: $209
103%
#24
Radeon RX 6600 LE
MSRP: $329|Avg: $160
102%
#25
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
102%
#26
Radeon RX 7700 XT
MSRP: $449|Avg: $380
102%
#27
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $380
102%
#28
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
MSRP: $269|Avg: $318
101%
#29
Radeon RX 6700 XT
MSRP: $479|Avg: $230
101%
#30
GeForce RTX 3060
MSRP: $329|Avg: $289
101%
#31
Radeon RX 7400
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
100%
#32
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
100%
#33
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
98%
#34
Radeon RX 5300
MSRP: $129|Avg: $50
96%
#35
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
MSRP: $150|Avg: $77
95%
#36
Radeon RX 6400
MSRP: $159|Avg: $139
95%
#37
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
MSRP: $599|Avg: $330
95%
#38
Arc A750
MSRP: $289|Avg: $229
94%
#39
Radeon RX 6800
MSRP: $579|Avg: $370
93%
#40
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $280
93%
#41
Radeon RX 6750 XT
MSRP: $549|Avg: $320
92%
#42
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
MSRP: $799|Avg: $590
92%
#43
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
91%
#44
GeForce RTX 5070
MSRP: $549|Avg: $550
90%
#45
Radeon RX 7600 XT
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
90%
#46
GeForce RTX 2050
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
88%
#47
GeForce RTX 3080
MSRP: $699|Avg: $400
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 158.6% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (16 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

InsightRadeon RX 9060 XT 16 GBGeForce GTX 1650
Performance
Leading raw performance (+158.6%)
Lower raw frame rates (-158.6%)
Longevity
🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 4.0 (2025) / 4nm)
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (16 GB)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (260mm)
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $349 for the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB, it costs 79% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 79.9% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon RX 9060 XT 16 GBGeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+79.9%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($349)
More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB and GeForce GTX 1650

AMD

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 3130 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,352 points. Launch price was $349.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB scores 20,352 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB leads by 158.6%. The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is built on RDNA 4.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 4 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 25.64 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 3130 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureRadeon RX 9060 XT 16 GBGeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
20,352+159%
7,869
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
Turing
Process Node
4 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2048+129%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
25.64 TFLOPS+759%
2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
3130 MHz+88%
1665 MHz
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
128+129%
56
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon RX 9060 XT 16 GBGeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 150% advantage for the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon RX 9060 XT 16 GBGeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
16 GB+300%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s+150%
128 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon RX 9060 XT 16 GBGeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 5.0 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: VCN 5.0 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureRadeon RX 9060 XT 16 GBGeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
VCN 5.0
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
VCN 5.0
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB draws 160W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 260mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78 vs 70°C.

FeatureRadeon RX 9060 XT 16 GBGeForce GTX 1650
TDP
160W
75W-53%
Recommended PSU
550W
300W-45%
Power Connector
8-pin
None
Length
260mm
229mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
78
70°C-10%
Perf/Watt
127.2+21%
104.9
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB launched at $349 MSRP and currently averages $349, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 78.5% less ($274 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 58.3 (Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 79.9% better value. The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).

FeatureRadeon RX 9060 XT 16 GBGeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$349
$149-57%
Avg Price (30d)
$349
$75-79%
Performance per Dollar
58.3
104.9+80%
Codename
Navi 44
TU117
Release
June 4 2025
April 23 2019
Ranking
#77
#323