
Radeon RX Vega 10 vs Quadro K3000M

Radeon RX Vega 10
Popular choices:

Quadro K3000M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K3000M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega 10 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2012). The Radeon RX Vega 10 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K3000M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX Vega 10 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K3000M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega 10 | Quadro K3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX Vega 10 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega 10 and Quadro K3000M

Radeon RX Vega 10
The Radeon RX Vega 10 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 8 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1301 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,629 points.

Quadro K3000M
The Quadro K3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 654 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,618 points. Launch price was $155.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX Vega 10 scores 1,629 and the Quadro K3000M reaches 1,618 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega 10 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Quadro K3000M uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon RX Vega 10) vs 576 (Quadro K3000M). Raw compute: 1.665 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 10) vs 0.7534 TFLOPS (Quadro K3000M).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 10 | Quadro K3000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,629 | 1,618 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+11% | 576 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.665 TFLOPS+121% | 0.7534 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 48+20% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 10 | Quadro K3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX Vega 10 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K3000M has 2 GB. The Quadro K3000M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 10 | Quadro K3000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega 10 draws 10W versus the Quadro K3000M's 75W — a 152.9% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 10 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega 10) vs 350W (Quadro K3000M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 10 | Quadro K3000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-87% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 162.9+654% | 21.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX Vega 10 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 10 | Quadro K3000M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | — |
| Codename | Raven | GK104 |
| Release | January 8 2019 | June 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #747 | #748 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















