
Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor vs FirePro M6000

Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor
Popular choices:

FirePro M6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M6000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is significantly newer (2018 vs 2012). The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro M6000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro M6000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor | FirePro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro M6000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor and FirePro M6000

Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor
The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1251 MHz. It has 704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,769 points.

FirePro M6000
The FirePro M6000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,820 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor scores 1,769 and the FirePro M6000 reaches 1,820 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is built on GCN 5.0 while the FirePro M6000 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 704 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor) vs 640 (FirePro M6000). Raw compute: 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M6000).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor | FirePro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,769 | 1,820+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 704+10% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.761 TFLOPS+72% | 1.024 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 44+10% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor | FirePro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro M6000 has 2 GB. The FirePro M6000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor | FirePro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor) vs 11.1 (FirePro M6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor | FirePro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1)+8% | 11.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 6+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro M6000). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (FirePro M6000).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor | FirePro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor draws 35W versus the FirePro M6000's 43W — a 20.5% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor) vs 350W (FirePro M6000). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor | FirePro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-19% | 43W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 50.5+19% | 42.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the FirePro M6000 launched at $300 and now averages $50. The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor) vs 36.4 (FirePro M6000) — the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor | FirePro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 36.4 |
| Codename | Raven | Heathrow |
| Release | May 10 2018 | July 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #673 | #710 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













