
Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor vs Iris Plus Graphics 950

Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor
Popular choices:

Iris Plus Graphics 950
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is significantly newer (2018 vs 0). The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Plus Graphics 950 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor and Iris Plus Graphics 950

Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor
The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1251 MHz. It has 704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,769 points.

Iris Plus Graphics 950
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor scores 1,769 and the Iris Plus Graphics 950 reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor is built on GCN 5.0 while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 uses Generation 11.0, both on 14 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 704 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Raw compute: 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Boost clocks: 1251 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,769 | 1,789+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Generation 11.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 704+38% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.761 TFLOPS+72% | 1.024 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1251 MHz+25% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 44+38% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor) vs Quick Sync 7 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs Quick Sync 7. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 (Iris Plus Graphics 950).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | Quick Sync 7 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | Quick Sync 7 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor draws 35W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 950's 15W — a 80% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W | 15W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 50.5 | 119.3+136% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 950) — the Iris Plus Graphics 950 offers NaN% better value.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 11 Processor | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | Raven | Ice Lake GT2 |
| Release | May 10 2018 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #673 | #634 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















