Radeon RX Vega 8 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Radeon RX Vega 8
Popular choices:
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega 8 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega 8 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX Vega 8 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega 8 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX Vega 8 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega 8 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Radeon RX Vega 8
The Radeon RX Vega 8 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,540 points.
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,538 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX Vega 8 scores 1,540 and the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 reaches 1,538 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega 8 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses Generation 8.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon RX Vega 8) vs 384 (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200). Boost clocks: 1190 MHz vs 1100 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 8 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,540 | 1,538 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Generation 8.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Boost Clock | 1190 MHz+8% | 1100 MHz |
| ROPs | 8+33% | 6 |
| TMUs | 32 | 48+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 8 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 8 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega 8 draws 15W versus the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200's 15W — a 0% difference. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega 8) vs 1W (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 8 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 102.7 | 102.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX Vega 8 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 8) vs Infinity (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) — the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 offers NaN% better value. The Radeon RX Vega 8 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 8 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | Vega | Broadwell GT3e |
| Release | February 1 2018 | September 5 2014 |
| Ranking | #372 | #763 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX Vega 8 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
