Radeon RX Vega 8
VS
Iris Pro Graphics P6300

Radeon RX Vega 8 vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300

AMD

Radeon RX Vega 8

2018Core: 720 MHzBoost: 1190 MHz
VS
Intel

Iris Pro Graphics P6300

2014Core: 300 MHzBoost: 800 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon RX Vega 8 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega 8 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega 8.

InsightRadeon RX Vega 8Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%)
Leading raw performance (+2.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega 8 and Iris Pro Graphics P6300

AMD

Radeon RX Vega 8

The Radeon RX Vega 8 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,540 points.

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics P6300

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX Vega 8 scores 1,540 and the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 reaches 1,582 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega 8 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 uses Generation 8.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon RX Vega 8) vs 384 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Boost clocks: 1190 MHz vs 800 MHz.

FeatureRadeon RX Vega 8Iris Pro Graphics P6300
G3D Mark Score
1,540
1,582+3%
Architecture
GCN 5.0
Generation 8.0
Process Node
14 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
512+33%
384
Boost Clock
1190 MHz+49%
800 MHz
ROPs
8+33%
6
TMUs
32
48+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon RX Vega 8Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.

FeatureRadeon RX Vega 8Iris Pro Graphics P6300
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
System
Bus Width
System
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Radeon RX Vega 8) vs 12 (11_1) (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6.

FeatureRadeon RX Vega 8Iris Pro Graphics P6300
DirectX
12
12 (11_1)
Vulkan
1.2+9%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX Vega 8 draws 15W versus the Iris Pro Graphics P6300's 15W — a 0% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega 8) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

FeatureRadeon RX Vega 8Iris Pro Graphics P6300
TDP
15W
15W
Recommended PSU
1W
1W
Power Connector
Integrated
Integrated
Temp (Load)
85°C
75°C-12%
Perf/Watt
102.7
105.5+3%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX Vega 8 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 launched at $150 and now averages $50. The Radeon RX Vega 8 costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 8) vs 31.6 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) — the Radeon RX Vega 8 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon RX Vega 8 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon RX Vega 8Iris Pro Graphics P6300
MSRP
$0-100%
$150
Avg Price (30d)
$0-100%
$50
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
31.6
Codename
Vega
Broadwell GT3e
Release
February 1 2018
September 5 2014
Ranking
#372
#755