Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
VS
GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 vs GeForce GTX 1650

AMD

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

2018Core: 931 MHzBoost: 1011 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is positioned at rank #206 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

#196
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
415%
#198
376%
#199
375%
#203
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
341%
#204
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
339%
#206
Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#208
Radeon RX Vega M GL
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#212
GeForce GTX 780M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60
98%
#216
Radeon 8040S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
93%
#217
Radeon R7 +8G
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
93%
#221
Radeon HD 6550A
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 100.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870.

InsightRadeon RX Vega M GL / 870GeForce GTX 1650
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-100.6%)
Leading raw performance (+100.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Vega (2017−2020))
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $150 for the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 301.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon RX Vega M GL / 870GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+301.3%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)
More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 and GeForce GTX 1650

AMD

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

The Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2018. It features the Vega architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,922 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 scores 3,922 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 100.6%. The Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is built on Vega while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1011 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureRadeon RX Vega M GL / 870GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
3,922
7,869+101%
Architecture
Vega
Turing
Process Node
14 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1280+43%
896
Boost Clock
1011 MHz
1665 MHz+65%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon RX Vega M GL / 870GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 179.2 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 40% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870. Bus width: 1024-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon RX Vega M GL / 870GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
4 GB
Memory Type
HBM2
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s+40%
128 GB/s
Bus Width
1024-bit+700%
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon RX Vega M GL / 870GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.4+17%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+100%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureRadeon RX Vega M GL / 870GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
VCE 3.0
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
UVD 6.3
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 draws 65W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 14.3% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Integrated vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 70°C.

FeatureRadeon RX Vega M GL / 870GeForce GTX 1650
TDP
65W-13%
75W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
300W
Power Connector
Integrated
None
Length
0mm
229mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80
70°C-13%
Perf/Watt
60.3
104.9+74%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 50% less ($75 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.1 (Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 301.9% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).

FeatureRadeon RX Vega M GL / 870GeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$150
$149
Avg Price (30d)
$150
$75-50%
Performance per Dollar
26.1
104.9+302%
Codename
Vega Kaby Lake-G
TU117
Release
January 7 2018
April 23 2019
Ranking
#427
#323