Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H vs Quadro M2000M
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
Popular choices:
Quadro M2000M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M2000M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H is significantly newer (2021 vs 2015). The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M2000M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro M2000M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H | Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H and Quadro M2000M
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2491 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,448 points. Launch price was $329.
Quadro M2000M
The Quadro M2000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1098 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,410 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H scores 3,448 and the Quadro M2000M reaches 3,410 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Quadro M2000M uses Maxwell, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H) vs 640 (Quadro M2000M). Raw compute: 8.928 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000M). Boost clocks: 2491 MHz vs 1098 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H | Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,448+1% | 3,410 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+180% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.928 TFLOPS+535% | 1.405 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2491 MHz+127% | 1098 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112+180% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+60% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H | Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M2000M has 4 GB. The Quadro M2000M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H | Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H draws 132W versus the Quadro M2000M's 55W — a 82.4% difference. The Quadro M2000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H) vs 350W (Quadro M2000M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H | Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 132W | 55W-58% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 26.1 | 62.0+138% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H | Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $350 | — |
| Codename | Navi 23 | GM107 |
| Release | October 13 2021 | December 3 2015 |
| Ranking | #150 | #550 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H and Quadro M2000M
