
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
Popular choices:

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
Performance Per Dollar Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $350 for the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H, it costs 86% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 588.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+588.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($350) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2491 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,448 points. Launch price was $329.
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H scores 3,448 and the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 reaches 3,390 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 7 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H) vs 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,448+2% | 3,390 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+1767% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H draws 132W versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 125.9% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H) vs 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 132W | 30W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 26.1 | 113.0+333% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H launched at $350 MSRP and currently averages $350, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100 and now averages $50. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 costs 85.7% less ($300 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.9 (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H) vs 67.8 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) — the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers 584.8% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350 | $100-71% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $350 | $50-86% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.9 | 67.8+585% |
| Codename | Navi 23 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | October 13 2021 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #150 | #508 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.




















