GRID K520 vs Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H

GRID K520

2013Core: 745 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H

2021Core: 1626 MHzBoost: 2491 MHz

GRID K520 vs Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K520 vs Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K520

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 928.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $3,599 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($3,599 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
  • 70.5% higher power demand at 225W vs 132W.

Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H

2021

Why buy it

  • Costs $3,249 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $3,599 MSRP).
  • Delivers 908.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.9 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $3,599 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 132W instead of 225W, a 93W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID K520 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2% in PassMark G3D (3,516 vs 3,448), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,249 cheaper on MSRP at $350 vs $3,599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 908.4% (9.9 vs 1.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID K520 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID K520 vs Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID K520

The GRID K520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,516 points. Launch price was $3,599.

AMD

Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H

The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2491 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,448 points. Launch price was $329.

Graphics Performance

The GRID K520 scores 3,516 and the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H reaches 3,448 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K520 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K520) vs 1,792 (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K520) vs 8.928 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H).

FeatureGRID K520Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
G3D Mark Score
3,516+2%
3,448
Architecture
Kepler
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
1536 ×2
1792+17%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.289 TFLOPS ×2
8.928 TFLOPS+290%
ROPs
32 ×2
64+100%
TMUs
128 ×2+14%
112
L1 Cache
128 KB
512 KB+300%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID K520Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K520 and System on the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID K520) vs 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H) — the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID K520Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K520 draws 225W versus the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H's 132W — a 52.1% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K520) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureGRID K520Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
TDP
225W
132W-41%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
15.6
26.1+67%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K520 came in at $3599, while the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H launched at $350. On MSRP, Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H was 90.3% cheaper ($3249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (GRID K520) vs 9.9 (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H) — the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H offers 890% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H (2021 vs 2013).

FeatureGRID K520Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
MSRP
$3599
$350-90%
Performance per Dollar
1.0
9.9+890%
Codename
GK104
Navi 23
Release
July 23 2013
October 13 2021
Ranking
#540
#150

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.