Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U vs Tesla K40m
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U
Popular choices:
Tesla K40m
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K40m
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U is significantly newer (2021 vs 2013). The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla K40m lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla K40m.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U | Tesla K40m |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U and Tesla K40m
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U
The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2491 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,206 points. Launch price was $329.
Tesla K40m
The Tesla K40m is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,143 points. Launch price was $7,699.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U scores 3,206 and the Tesla K40m reaches 3,143 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Tesla K40m uses Kepler, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U) vs 2,880 (Tesla K40m). Raw compute: 8.928 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U) vs 5.046 TFLOPS (Tesla K40m). Boost clocks: 2491 MHz vs 876 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U | Tesla K40m |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,206+2% | 3,143 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2880+61% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.928 TFLOPS+77% | 5.046 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2491 MHz+184% | 876 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 112 | 240+114% |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+113% | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U | Tesla K40m |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K40m) — the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U | Tesla K40m |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U draws 132W versus the Tesla K40m's 245W — a 59.9% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U) vs 350W (Tesla K40m). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U | Tesla K40m |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 132W-46% | 245W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 24.3+90% | 12.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U | Tesla K40m |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $350 | — |
| Codename | Navi 23 | GK110B |
| Release | October 13 2021 | November 22 2013 |
| Ranking | #150 | #573 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U and Tesla K40m
