Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U vs Tesla K40m

AMD

Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U

2021Core: 1626 MHzBoost: 2491 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla K40m

2013Core: 745 MHzBoost: 876 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U vs Tesla K40m Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U vs Tesla K40m: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U

2021

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 132W instead of 245W, a 113W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Tesla K40m

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
  • 85.6% higher power demand at 245W vs 132W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2% in PassMark G3D (3,206 vs 3,143), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U vs Tesla K40m Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U

The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2491 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,206 points. Launch price was $329.

NVIDIA

Tesla K40m

The Tesla K40m is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,143 points. Launch price was $7,699.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U scores 3,206 and the Tesla K40m reaches 3,143 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Tesla K40m uses Kepler, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U) vs 2,880 (Tesla K40m). Raw compute: 8.928 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U) vs 5.046 TFLOPS (Tesla K40m). Boost clocks: 2491 MHz vs 876 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Ryzen 5 6600UTesla K40m
G3D Mark Score
3,206+2%
3,143
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Kepler
Process Node
7 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1792
2880+61%
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.928 TFLOPS+77%
5.046 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2491 MHz+184%
876 MHz
ROPs
64+33%
48
TMUs
112
240+114%
L1 Cache
512 KB+113%
240 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+33%
1.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Ryzen 5 6600UTesla K40m
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U and 64-bit on the Tesla K40m. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K40m) — the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Ryzen 5 6600UTesla K40m
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+33%
1.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U draws 132W versus the Tesla K40m's 245W — a 59.9% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U) vs 350W (Tesla K40m). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon Ryzen 5 6600UTesla K40m
TDP
132W-46%
245W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
24.3+90%
12.8
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U (2021 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon Ryzen 5 6600UTesla K40m
MSRP
$350
Codename
Navi 23
GK110B
Release
October 13 2021
November 22 2013
Ranking
#150
#573

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.