Quadro K5100M vs Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U

NVIDIA

Quadro K5100M

2013Core: 771 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U

2021Core: 1626 MHzBoost: 2491 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro K5100M vs Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K5100M vs Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K5100M vs Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K5100M

2013

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 100W instead of 132W, a 32W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $350 MSRP).

Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U

2021

Why buy it

  • 24.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 32% higher power demand at 132W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 24.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro K5100M instead at 3,264 vs 3,206, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro K5100M vs Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro K5100M

The Quadro K5100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,264 points.

AMD

Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U

The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2491 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,206 points. Launch price was $329.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K5100M scores 3,264 and the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U reaches 3,206 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5100M is built on Kepler while the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Quadro K5100M) vs 1,792 (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U). Raw compute: 2.369 TFLOPS (Quadro K5100M) vs 8.928 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U).

FeatureQuadro K5100MRadeon Ryzen 5 6600U
G3D Mark Score
3,264+2%
3,206
Architecture
Kepler
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
1536
1792+17%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.369 TFLOPS
8.928 TFLOPS+277%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
128+14%
112
L1 Cache
128 KB
512 KB+300%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K5100MRadeon Ryzen 5 6600U
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K5100M has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U carries 2 GB. Quadro K5100M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K5100M and System on the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K5100M) vs 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U) — the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro K5100MRadeon Ryzen 5 6600U
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+300%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K5100M draws 100W versus the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U's 132W — a 27.6% difference. The Quadro K5100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5100M) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureQuadro K5100MRadeon Ryzen 5 6600U
TDP
100W-24%
132W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
32.6+34%
24.3
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U (2021 vs 2013).

FeatureQuadro K5100MRadeon Ryzen 5 6600U
MSRP
$350
Codename
GK104
Navi 23
Release
July 23 2013
October 13 2021
Ranking
#562
#150

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.