Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Quadro K5100M

Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

2020Core: 400 MHzBoost: 1350 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K5100M

2013Core: 771 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Quadro K5100M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Quadro K5100M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 28W instead of 100W, a 72W reduction.
  • More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro K5100M

2013

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro K5100M is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 257.1% higher power demand at 100W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (3,311 vs 3,264), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro K5100M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K5100M has the stronger long-term case.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Quadro K5100M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro K5100M

The Quadro K5100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,264 points.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs scores 3,311 and the Quadro K5100M reaches 3,264 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the Quadro K5100M uses Kepler, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs) vs 1,536 (Quadro K5100M).

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 96EUsQuadro K5100M
G3D Mark Score
3,311+1%
3,264
Architecture
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Kepler
Process Node
10 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
96
1536+1500%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 96EUsQuadro K5100M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5100M carries 8 GB. Quadro K5100M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and 64-bit on the Quadro K5100M.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 96EUsQuadro K5100M
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
8 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K5100M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 96EUsQuadro K5100M
DirectX
12.1
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs) vs 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (Quadro K5100M). Decoder: QuickSync vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro K5100M).

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 96EUsQuadro K5100M
Encoder
QuickSync
1st Gen NVENC (Kepler)
Decoder
QuickSync
PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs draws 28W versus the Quadro K5100M's 100W — a 112.5% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs) vs 350W (Quadro K5100M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 96EUsQuadro K5100M
TDP
28W-72%
100W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
85°C
Perf/Watt
118.3+263%
32.6
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2020 vs 2013).

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7 96EUsQuadro K5100M
MSRP
$0
Codename
Tiger Lake Xe
GK104
Release
August 15 2020
July 23 2013
Ranking
#536
#562

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.