GeForce 770M
VS
Quadro K5100M

GeForce 770M vs Quadro K5100M

NVIDIA

GeForce 770M

2013Core: 811 MHzBoost: 797 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K5100M

2013Core: 771 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 770M is positioned at rank 57 and the Quadro K5100M is on rank 28, so the Quadro K5100M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 770M

#19
Radeon RX 5600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $150
95%
#47
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
201%
#49
182%
#50
181%
#54
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
165%
#55
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
164%
#57
GeForce 770M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
100%
#62
Radeon 820M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
99%
#65
97%
#66
97%
#68
GeForce GTX 850M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K5100M

#9
Intel Arc Pro B50
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
86%
#11
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
MSRP: $900|Avg: $300
82%
#13
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
362%
#16
Radeon PRO W7500
MSRP: $429|Avg: $401
76%
#18
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340
75%
#19
RTX A2000 12GB
MSRP: $449|Avg: $380
75%
#20
Radeon Pro Vega 56
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
74%
#21
RTX A2000
MSRP: $450|Avg: $320
73%
#28
Quadro K5100M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#29
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $100
97%
#33
Radeon PRO W6400
MSRP: $229|Avg: $200
90%
#36
T600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $180
79%
#43
P106-100
MSRP: $224|Avg: $30
73%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro K5100M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 770M.

InsightGeForce 770MQuadro K5100M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)
Leading raw performance (+0.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+1500%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro K5100M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 770M and Quadro K5100M

NVIDIA

GeForce 770M

The GeForce 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 811 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,246 points. Launch price was $189.99.

NVIDIA

Quadro K5100M

The Quadro K5100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,264 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 770M scores 3,246 and the Quadro K5100M reaches 3,264 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 770M is built on Kepler while the Quadro K5100M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 960 (GeForce 770M) vs 1,536 (Quadro K5100M). Raw compute: 1.53 TFLOPS (GeForce 770M) vs 2.369 TFLOPS (Quadro K5100M).

FeatureGeForce 770MQuadro K5100M
G3D Mark Score
3,246
3,264
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
960
1536+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.53 TFLOPS
2.369 TFLOPS+55%
ROPs
24
32+33%
TMUs
80
128+60%
L1 Cache
80 KB
128 KB+60%
L2 Cache
384 KB
512 KB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 770MQuadro K5100M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 770M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5100M has 8 GB. The Quadro K5100M offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce 770M) vs 512 KB (Quadro K5100M) — the Quadro K5100M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 770MQuadro K5100M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
8 GB+1500%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
384 KB
512 KB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (GeForce 770M) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K5100M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce 770MQuadro K5100M
DirectX
11.1
12 (11_0)+8%
Vulkan
1.1
1.2+9%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1 (GeForce 770M) vs 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (Quadro K5100M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 770M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro K5100M).

FeatureGeForce 770MQuadro K5100M
Encoder
NVENC 1
1st Gen NVENC (Kepler)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 770M draws 75W versus the Quadro K5100M's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce 770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 770M) vs 350W (Quadro K5100M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce 770MQuadro K5100M
TDP
75W-25%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
85°C
Perf/Watt
43.3+33%
32.6