GeForce 770M vs P102-100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 770M is positioned at rank 57 and the P102-100 is on rank 201, so the GeForce 770M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 770M

#19

Radeon RX 5600

MSRP: $229|Avg: $150

95%

#47

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

201%

#49

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

182%

#50

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

181%

#54

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

165%

#55

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

164%

#57

GeForce 770M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

100%

#62

Radeon 820M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

99%

#65

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

97%

#66

GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

97%

#68

GeForce GTX 850M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar P102-100

#87

A10G

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2000

99%

#88

Tesla T4

MSRP: $1880|Avg: $1000

98%

#89

Tesla M40 24GB

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $120

97%

#90

Quadro P5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400

93%

#91

RTX PRO 6000

MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565

91%

#186

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2686%

#201

P102-100

MSRP: $600|Avg: $80

100%

#203

Quadro FX 2700

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

99%

#206

FirePro V3900

MSRP: $119|Avg: $30

96%

#207

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

MSRP: $119|Avg: $89

96%

#208

Tesla K8

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100

93%

#210

GRID K240Q

MSRP: $500|Avg: $40

92%

#211

FirePro M4150

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

92%

#212

FirePro V4900

MSRP: $200|Avg: $47

92%

#213

GRID K160Q

MSRP: $125|Avg: $30

91%

#215

Quadro

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50

91%

#216

FirePro W5000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The P102-100 uses modern memory architecture. The P102-100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 770M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The P102-100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 770M.

Insight	GeForce 770M	P102-100
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 770M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $80 for the P102-100, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 96.7% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce 770M	P102-100
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+96.7%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($40)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce 770M Benchmark Check

P102-100 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 770M and P102-100

GeForce 770M

The GeForce 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 811 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,246 points. Launch price was $189.99.

P102-100

The P102-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1582 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 3200 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,301 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 770M scores 3,246 and the P102-100 reaches 3,301 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 770M is built on Kepler while the P102-100 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 960 (GeForce 770M) vs 3,200 (P102-100). Raw compute: 1.53 TFLOPS (GeForce 770M) vs 10.77 TFLOPS (P102-100). Boost clocks: 797 MHz vs 1683 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 770M	P102-100
G3D Mark Score	3,246	3,301+2%
Architecture	Kepler	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	960	3200+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.53 TFLOPS	10.77 TFLOPS+604%
Boost Clock	797 MHz	1683 MHz+111%
ROPs	24	80+233%
TMUs	80	200+150%
L1 Cache	0.08 MB	1.2 MB+1400%
L2 Cache	0.38 MB	2.5 MB+558%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 770M	P102-100
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 770M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the P102-100 has 2 GB. The P102-100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce 770M) vs 2.5 MB (P102-100) — the P102-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 770M	P102-100
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.38 MB	2.5 MB+558%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (GeForce 770M) vs 12_1 (P102-100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce 770M	P102-100
DirectX	11.1	12_1+8%
Max Displays	4	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 770M draws 75W versus the P102-100's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce 770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 770M) vs 350W (P102-100). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce 770M	P102-100
TDP	75W-70%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	43.3+228%	13.2

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 770M costs 50% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 81.2 (GeForce 770M) vs 41.3 (P102-100) — the GeForce 770M offers 96.6% better value. The P102-100 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).