
GeForce 770M
Popular choices:

HD Graphics 530
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce 770M
2013Why buy it
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- β Less risky long-term buy than HD Graphics 530: it remains the more sensible modern option while HD Graphics 530 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
HD Graphics 530
2015Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
- β More future proof: Generation 9.0 (2015β2016) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce 770M
2013HD Graphics 530
2015Why buy it
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- β Less risky long-term buy than HD Graphics 530: it remains the more sensible modern option while HD Graphics 530 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
- β More future proof: Generation 9.0 (2015β2016) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is HD Graphics 530 better than GeForce 770M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce 770M make more sense than HD Graphics 530?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce 770M | HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 31 FPS | 15 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce 770M | HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 20 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 22 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce 770M | HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 26 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce 770M | HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 18 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 2 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 770M and HD Graphics 530

GeForce 770M
GeForce 770M
The GeForce 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 811 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,246 points. Launch price was $189.99.

HD Graphics 530
HD Graphics 530
The HD Graphics 530 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 770M scores 3,246 and the HD Graphics 530 reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 770M is built on Kepler while the HD Graphics 530 uses Generation 9.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 960 (GeForce 770M) vs 192 (HD Graphics 530). Raw compute: 1.53 TFLOPS (GeForce 770M) vs 0.3648 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 530). Boost clocks: 797 MHz vs 950 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 770M | HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,246 | 3,311+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Generation 9.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm+ |
| Shading Units | 960+400% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.53 TFLOPS+319% | 0.3648 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 797 MHz | 950 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 24+700% | 3 |
| TMUs | 80+233% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 770M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The HD Graphics 530 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce 770M | HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 770M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the HD Graphics 530 has 0 MB. The GeForce 770M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce 770M | HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (GeForce 770M) vs 12 (HD Graphics 530). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce 770M | HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 | 12+8% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6+7% | 4.3 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1 (GeForce 770M) vs Quick Sync (Skylake) (HD Graphics 530). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs Gen 9. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 770M) vs H.264,HEVC (8-bit),VP8 (HD Graphics 530).
| Feature | GeForce 770M | HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1 | Quick Sync (Skylake) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | Gen 9 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 | H.264,HEVC (8-bit),VP8 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 770M draws 75W versus the HD Graphics 530's 15W β a 133.3% difference. The HD Graphics 530 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 770M) vs 1W (HD Graphics 530). Power connectors: Legacy vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 85Β°C vs 75Β°C.
| Feature | GeForce 770M | HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | β |
| Height | 0mm | β |
| Slots | 0 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 85Β°C | 75Β°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 43.3 | 220.7+410% |
Value Analysis
The HD Graphics 530 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce 770M | HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | β | $0 |
| Codename | GK106 | Skylake GT2 |
| Release | May 30 2013 | September 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #603 | #887 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













