GeForce 770M vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce 770M

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs: it remains the more sensible modern option while Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌167.9% higher power demand at 75W vs 28W.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 75W, a 47W reduction.
✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

GeForce 770M

2013

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

2020

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs: it remains the more sensible modern option while Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 75W, a 47W reduction.
✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌167.9% higher power demand at 75W vs 28W.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs better than GeForce 770M?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,246 vs 3,311 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (28W vs 75W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 770M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 512 MB instead of Unknown. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 2.0% higher G3D Mark. GeForce 770M is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does GeForce 770M make more sense than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs?

Yes. GeForce 770M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. The trade-off is that Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs currently gives you 2.0% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce 770M Benchmark Check

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce 770M	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
1080p
low	40 FPS	78 FPS
medium	26 FPS	69 FPS
high	18 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	9 FPS	31 FPS
1440p
low	30 FPS	65 FPS
medium	18 FPS	57 FPS
high	9 FPS	36 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	23 FPS
4K
low	11 FPS	24 FPS
medium	7 FPS	23 FPS
high	4 FPS	14 FPS
ultra	3 FPS	12 FPS

Open GeForce 770M Open Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce 770M	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
1080p
low	39 FPS	86 FPS
medium	19 FPS	58 FPS
high	14 FPS	40 FPS
ultra	9 FPS	27 FPS
1440p
low	20 FPS	58 FPS
medium	9 FPS	34 FPS
high	7 FPS	25 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	19 FPS
4K
low	6 FPS	28 FPS
medium	3 FPS	18 FPS
high	3 FPS	14 FPS
ultra	2 FPS	11 FPS

Open GeForce 770M Open Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce 770M	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
1080p
low	146 FPS	149 FPS
medium	117 FPS	119 FPS
high	97 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	74 FPS
1440p
low	110 FPS	112 FPS
medium	88 FPS	89 FPS
high	73 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	73 FPS	74 FPS
medium	58 FPS	60 FPS
high	49 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	37 FPS

Open GeForce 770M Open Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce 770M	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
1080p
low	72 FPS	137 FPS
medium	61 FPS	107 FPS
high	50 FPS	87 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	68 FPS
1440p
low	42 FPS	102 FPS
medium	36 FPS	81 FPS
high	32 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	50 FPS
4K
low	28 FPS	62 FPS
medium	22 FPS	48 FPS
high	19 FPS	39 FPS
ultra	13 FPS	29 FPS

Open GeForce 770M Open Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 770M and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

GeForce 770M

The GeForce 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 811 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,246 points. Launch price was $189.99.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 770M scores 3,246 and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 770M is built on Kepler while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 960 (GeForce 770M) vs 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs). Boost clocks: 797 MHz vs 1350 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 770M	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
G3D Mark Score	3,246	3,311+2%
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node	28 nm	10 nm
Shading Units	960+900%	96
Boost Clock	797 MHz	1350 MHz+69%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 770M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce 770M	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 770M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs has 0 MB. The GeForce 770M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

Feature	GeForce 770M	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (GeForce 770M) vs 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce 770M	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
DirectX	11.1	12.1+9%
Vulkan	1.1	1.2+9%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1 (GeForce 770M) vs QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 770M) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs).

Feature	GeForce 770M	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Encoder	NVENC 1	QuickSync
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP5	QuickSync
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4	H.264,HEVC,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 770M draws 75W versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs's 28W — a 91.3% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 770M) vs 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs). Power connectors: Legacy vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.