HD Graphics 530 vs Quadro K5100M

HD Graphics 530

2015Core: 350 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K5100M

2013Core: 771 MHz
Similar parts
·······

HD Graphics 530 vs Quadro K5100M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

HD Graphics 530 vs Quadro K5100M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

HD Graphics 530

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 9.0 (2015−2016) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro K5100M

2013

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
  • HD Graphics 530 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro K5100M is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
HD Graphics 530 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (3,311 vs 3,264), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro K5100M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
HD Graphics 530 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, HD Graphics 530 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K5100M has the stronger long-term case.

HD Graphics 530 vs Quadro K5100M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

HD Graphics 530

The HD Graphics 530 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro K5100M

The Quadro K5100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,264 points.

Graphics Performance

The HD Graphics 530 scores 3,311 and the Quadro K5100M reaches 3,264 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 530 is built on Generation 9.0 while the Quadro K5100M uses Kepler, both on 14 nm+ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics 530) vs 1,536 (Quadro K5100M). Raw compute: 0.3648 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 530) vs 2.369 TFLOPS (Quadro K5100M).

FeatureHD Graphics 530Quadro K5100M
G3D Mark Score
3,311+1%
3,264
Architecture
Generation 9.0
Kepler
Process Node
14 nm+
28 nm
Shading Units
192
1536+700%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.3648 TFLOPS
2.369 TFLOPS+549%
ROPs
3
32+967%
TMUs
24
128+433%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureHD Graphics 530Quadro K5100M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The HD Graphics 530 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5100M carries 8 GB. Quadro K5100M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the HD Graphics 530 and 64-bit on the Quadro K5100M.

FeatureHD Graphics 530Quadro K5100M
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
8 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (HD Graphics 530) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K5100M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureHD Graphics 530Quadro K5100M
DirectX
12
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.3
4.6+7%
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Quick Sync (Skylake) (HD Graphics 530) vs 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (Quadro K5100M). Decoder: Gen 9 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (8-bit),VP8 (HD Graphics 530) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro K5100M).

FeatureHD Graphics 530Quadro K5100M
Encoder
Quick Sync (Skylake)
1st Gen NVENC (Kepler)
Decoder
Gen 9
PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs
H.264,HEVC (8-bit),VP8
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The HD Graphics 530 draws 15W versus the Quadro K5100M's 100W — a 147.8% difference. The HD Graphics 530 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 530) vs 350W (Quadro K5100M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

FeatureHD Graphics 530Quadro K5100M
TDP
15W-85%
100W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C-12%
85°C
Perf/Watt
220.7+577%
32.6
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is HD Graphics 530 (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureHD Graphics 530Quadro K5100M
MSRP
$0
Codename
Skylake GT2
GK104
Release
September 1 2015
July 23 2013
Ranking
#887
#562

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.