
HD Graphics 530 vs Radeon RX 560X

HD Graphics 530
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 560X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 560X uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 560X likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The HD Graphics 530 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 560X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the HD Graphics 530.
| Insight | HD Graphics 530 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 560X remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of HD Graphics 530 and Radeon RX 560X

HD Graphics 530
The HD Graphics 530 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

Radeon RX 560X
The Radeon RX 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,340 points.
Graphics Performance
The HD Graphics 530 scores 3,311 and the Radeon RX 560X reaches 3,340 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 530 is built on Generation 9.0 while the Radeon RX 560X uses GCN 4.0, both on 14 nm+ vs 14 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics 530) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X). Raw compute: 0.3648 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 530) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560X). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1275 MHz.
| Feature | HD Graphics 530 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,311 | 3,340 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+ | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 1024+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.3648 TFLOPS | 2.611 TFLOPS+616% |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1275 MHz+34% |
| ROPs | 3 | 16+433% |
| TMUs | 24 | 64+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | HD Graphics 530 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The HD Graphics 530 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560X has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 560X offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 256-bit.
| Feature | HD Graphics 530 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The HD Graphics 530 draws 15W versus the Radeon RX 560X's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The HD Graphics 530 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 530) vs 400W (Radeon RX 560X). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.
| Feature | HD Graphics 530 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-80% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 400W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | None |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 220.7+396% | 44.5 |
Value Analysis
The HD Graphics 530 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon RX 560X launched at $129 and now averages $40. The HD Graphics 530 costs 100+% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (HD Graphics 530) vs 83.5 (Radeon RX 560X) — the HD Graphics 530 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon RX 560X is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | HD Graphics 530 | Radeon RX 560X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $129 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 83.5 |
| Codename | Skylake GT2 | Polaris 21 |
| Release | September 1 2015 | April 11 2018 |
| Ranking | #887 | #556 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















