HD Graphics 530 vs P102-100

HD Graphics 530

2015Core: 350 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS

P102-100

2018Core: 1582 MHzBoost: 1683 MHz
Similar parts
···

HD Graphics 530 vs P102-100 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

HD Graphics 530 vs P102-100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

HD Graphics 530

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 250W, a 235W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

P102-100

2018

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • HD Graphics 530 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so P102-100 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 1566.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
HD Graphics 530 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (3,311 vs 3,301), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
P102-100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
P102-100 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. HD Graphics 530 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

HD Graphics 530 vs P102-100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

HD Graphics 530

The HD Graphics 530 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

NVIDIA

P102-100

The P102-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1582 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 3200 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,301 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

The HD Graphics 530 scores 3,311 and the P102-100 reaches 3,301 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 530 is built on Generation 9.0 while the P102-100 uses Pascal, both on 14 nm+ vs 16 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics 530) vs 3,200 (P102-100). Raw compute: 0.3648 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 530) vs 10.77 TFLOPS (P102-100). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1683 MHz.

FeatureHD Graphics 530P102-100
G3D Mark Score
3,311
3,301
Architecture
Generation 9.0
Pascal
Process Node
14 nm+
16 nm
Shading Units
192
3200+1567%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.3648 TFLOPS
10.77 TFLOPS+2852%
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1683 MHz+77%
ROPs
3
80+2567%
TMUs
24
200+733%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureHD Graphics 530P102-100
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The HD Graphics 530 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the P102-100 carries 2 GB. P102-100 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the HD Graphics 530 and 64-bit on the P102-100.

FeatureHD Graphics 530P102-100
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (HD Graphics 530) vs 12_1 (P102-100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

FeatureHD Graphics 530P102-100
DirectX
12
12_1
Max Displays
3
0
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The HD Graphics 530 draws 15W versus the P102-100's 250W — a 177.4% difference. The HD Graphics 530 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 530) vs 350W (P102-100). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureHD Graphics 530P102-100
TDP
15W-94%
250W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
220.7+1572%
13.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the HD Graphics 530 came in at $0, while the P102-100 launched at $600. On MSRP, HD Graphics 530 was 100+% cheaper ($600 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (HD Graphics 530) vs 5.5 (P102-100) — the HD Graphics 530 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is P102-100 (2018 vs 2015).

FeatureHD Graphics 530P102-100
MSRP
$0-100%
$600
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
5.5
Codename
Skylake GT2
GP102
Release
September 1 2015
February 12 2018
Ranking
#887
#560

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.