HD Graphics 530 vs Quadro P600

HD Graphics 530

2015Core: 350 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P600

2017Core: 1430 MHzBoost: 1620 MHz
Similar parts
·······

HD Graphics 530 vs Quadro P600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

HD Graphics 530 vs Quadro P600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

HD Graphics 530

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 40W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro P600

2017

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • HD Graphics 530 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro P600 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 166.7% higher power demand at 40W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro P600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (3,318 vs 3,311), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P600 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

HD Graphics 530 vs Quadro P600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

HD Graphics 530

The HD Graphics 530 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro P600

The Quadro P600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,318 points. Launch price was $178.

Graphics Performance

The HD Graphics 530 scores 3,311 and the Quadro P600 reaches 3,318 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 530 is built on Generation 9.0 while the Quadro P600 uses Pascal, both on 14 nm+ vs 14 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics 530) vs 384 (Quadro P600). Raw compute: 0.3648 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 530) vs 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro P600). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1620 MHz.

FeatureHD Graphics 530Quadro P600
G3D Mark Score
3,311
3,318
Architecture
Generation 9.0
Pascal
Process Node
14 nm+
14 nm
Shading Units
192
384+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.3648 TFLOPS
1.244 TFLOPS+241%
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1620 MHz+71%
ROPs
3
16+433%
TMUs
24
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureHD Graphics 530Quadro P600
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The HD Graphics 530 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro P600 carries 2 GB. Quadro P600 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the HD Graphics 530 and 64-bit on the Quadro P600.

FeatureHD Graphics 530Quadro P600
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (HD Graphics 530) vs 12_1 (Quadro P600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureHD Graphics 530Quadro P600
DirectX
12
12_1
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Quick Sync (Skylake) (HD Graphics 530) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P600). Decoder: Gen 9 vs NVDEC 4th Gen.

FeatureHD Graphics 530Quadro P600
Encoder
Quick Sync (Skylake)
NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder
Gen 9
NVDEC 4th Gen
Codecs
H.264,HEVC (8-bit),VP8
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The HD Graphics 530 draws 15W versus the Quadro P600's 40W — a 90.9% difference. The HD Graphics 530 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 530) vs 350W (Quadro P600). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureHD Graphics 530Quadro P600
TDP
15W-63%
40W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
145mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
220.7+166%
83.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the HD Graphics 530 came in at $0, while the Quadro P600 launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (HD Graphics 530) vs Infinity (Quadro P600) — the Quadro P600 offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P600 (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureHD Graphics 530Quadro P600
MSRP
$0
$0
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
Infinity
Codename
Skylake GT2
GP107
Release
September 1 2015
February 7 2017
Ranking
#887
#558

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.