Quadro K5100M vs Radeon 660M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K5100M vs Radeon 660M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K5100M vs Radeon 660M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K5100M

2013

Why buy it

✅59.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌150% higher power demand at 100W vs 40W.

Radeon 660M

2023

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 40W instead of 100W, a 60W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K5100M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K5100M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 59.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (3,264 vs 3,221), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 660M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K5100M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro K5100M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 660M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K5100M vs Radeon 660M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K5100M

The Quadro K5100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,264 points.

Radeon 660M

The Radeon 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,221 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K5100M scores 3,264 and the Radeon 660M reaches 3,221 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5100M is built on Kepler while the Radeon 660M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Quadro K5100M) vs 384 (Radeon 660M). Raw compute: 2.369 TFLOPS (Quadro K5100M) vs 1.459 TFLOPS (Radeon 660M).

Feature	Quadro K5100M	Radeon 660M
G3D Mark Score	3,264+1%	3,221
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	1536+300%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.369 TFLOPS+62%	1.459 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	128+433%	24
L1 Cache	128 KB	128 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K5100M	Radeon 660M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K5100M has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 660M carries 2 GB. Quadro K5100M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K5100M and System on the Radeon 660M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K5100M) vs 2 MB (Radeon 660M) — the Radeon 660M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K5100M	Radeon 660M
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K5100M draws 100W versus the Radeon 660M's 40W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5100M) vs 350W (Radeon 660M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.