P102-100 vs Quadro K5100M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

P102-100 vs Quadro K5100M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

P102-100 vs Quadro K5100M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

P102-100

2018

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Quadro K5100M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so P102-100 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.

Quadro K5100M

2013

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

P102-100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (3,301 vs 3,264), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

P102-100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

P102-100 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

P102-100 vs Quadro K5100M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

P102-100

The P102-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1582 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 3200 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,301 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro K5100M

The Quadro K5100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,264 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The P102-100 scores 3,301 and the Quadro K5100M reaches 3,264 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The P102-100 is built on Pascal while the Quadro K5100M uses Kepler, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,200 (P102-100) vs 1,536 (Quadro K5100M). Raw compute: 10.77 TFLOPS (P102-100) vs 2.369 TFLOPS (Quadro K5100M).

Feature	P102-100	Quadro K5100M
G3D Mark Score	3,301+1%	3,264
Architecture	Pascal	Kepler
Process Node	16 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	3200+108%	1536
Compute (TFLOPS)	10.77 TFLOPS+355%	2.369 TFLOPS
ROPs	80+150%	32
TMUs	200+56%	128
L1 Cache	1.2 MB+823%	0.13 MB
L2 Cache	2.5 MB+400%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	P102-100	Quadro K5100M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The P102-100 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5100M carries 8 GB. Quadro K5100M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the P102-100 and 64-bit on the Quadro K5100M. L2 Cache: 2.5 MB (P102-100) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro K5100M) — the P102-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	P102-100	Quadro K5100M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	8 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2.5 MB+400%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (P102-100) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K5100M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	P102-100	Quadro K5100M
DirectX	12_1	12 (11_0)
Max Displays	0	4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The P102-100 draws 250W versus the Quadro K5100M's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro K5100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P102-100) vs 350W (Quadro K5100M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	P102-100	Quadro K5100M
TDP	250W	100W-60%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	—	85°C
Perf/Watt	13.2	32.6+147%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is P102-100 (2018 vs 2013).

Feature	P102-100	Quadro K5100M
MSRP	$600	—
Codename	GP102	GK104
Release	February 12 2018	July 23 2013
Ranking	#560	#562

Search P102-100 on Amazon

Search Quadro K5100M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.