Iris Xe Graphics G7
P102-100
Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs P102-100 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs P102-100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs P102-100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Iris Xe Graphics G7
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 200.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 250W, a 220W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
P102-100
2018Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Xe Graphics G7 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so P102-100 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌200% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 16.6 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ❌733.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs P102-100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Iris Xe Graphics G7
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
P102-100
The P102-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1582 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 3200 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,301 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 scores 3,311 and the P102-100 reaches 3,301 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the P102-100 uses Pascal, both on 10 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 3,200 (P102-100).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,311 | 3,301 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Pascal |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 96 | 3200+3233% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the P102-100 carries 2 GB. P102-100 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Xe Graphics G7 and 64-bit on the P102-100.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 12_1 (P102-100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 draws 30W versus the P102-100's 250W — a 157.1% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 350W (P102-100). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-88% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 110.4+736% | 13.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 came in at $200, while the P102-100 launched at $600. On MSRP, Iris Xe Graphics G7 was 66.7% cheaper ($400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.6 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 5.5 (P102-100) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 offers 201.8% better value. The newer card here is Iris Xe Graphics G7 (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | P102-100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200-67% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.6+202% | 5.5 |
| Codename | Tiger Lake Xe | GP102 |
| Release | August 15 2020 | February 12 2018 |
| Ranking | #493 | #560 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Xe Graphics G7 and P102-100
