Iris Xe Graphics G7
VS
P102-100

Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs P102-100

Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7

2020
VS

P102-100

2018Core: 1582 MHzBoost: 1683 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is positioned at rank 282 and the P102-100 is on rank 201, so the P102-100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe Graphics G7

#61
GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)
MSRP: $800|Avg: $350
93%
#272
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
656%
#274
594%
#275
593%
#279
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
539%
#280
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
535%
#282
Iris Xe Graphics G7
MSRP: $200|Avg: $100
100%
#283
Radeon R9 M395
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#285
GeForce GT 755M SLI
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
99%
#286
GeForce GTX 950A
MSRP: $159|Avg: $30
99%
#288
Radeon 540X
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
97%
#289
GeForce 930MX
MSRP: $80|Avg: $25
96%
#291
GeForce MX250
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
96%
#292
Radeon 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
95%
#293
GeForce MX330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
95%
#296
Radeon RX 780
MSRP: $499|Avg: $721
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar P102-100

#87
A10G
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2000
99%
#88
Tesla T4
MSRP: $1880|Avg: $1000
98%
#89
Tesla M40 24GB
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $120
97%
#90
Quadro P5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400
93%
#91
RTX PRO 6000
MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565
91%
#186
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
2686%
#201
P102-100
MSRP: $600|Avg: $80
100%
#203
Quadro FX 2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
99%
#206
FirePro V3900
MSRP: $119|Avg: $30
96%
#207
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
MSRP: $119|Avg: $89
96%
#208
Tesla K8
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
93%
#210
GRID K240Q
MSRP: $500|Avg: $40
92%
#211
FirePro M4150
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
92%
#212
FirePro V4900
MSRP: $200|Avg: $47
92%
#213
GRID K160Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $30
91%
#215
Quadro
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50
91%
#216
FirePro W5000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the P102-100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightIris Xe Graphics G7P102-100
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%)
Longevity
Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The P102-100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $80 versus $100 for the Iris Xe Graphics G7, it costs 20% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 24.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightIris Xe Graphics G7P102-100
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+24.6%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100)
More affordable ($80)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe Graphics G7 and P102-100

Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

NVIDIA

P102-100

The P102-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1582 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 3200 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,301 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 scores 3,311 and the P102-100 reaches 3,301 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the P102-100 uses Pascal, both on 10 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 3,200 (P102-100).

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7P102-100
G3D Mark Score
3,311
3,301
Architecture
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Pascal
Process Node
10 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
96
3200+3233%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7P102-100
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the P102-100 has 2 GB. The P102-100 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7P102-100
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 12_1 (P102-100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7P102-100
DirectX
12.1
12_1
Max Displays
4
0
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 draws 30W versus the P102-100's 250W — a 157.1% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 350W (P102-100). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7P102-100
TDP
30W-88%
250W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
110.4+736%
13.2
💰

Value Analysis

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the P102-100 launched at $600 and now averages $80. The P102-100 costs 20% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 41.3 (P102-100) — the P102-100 offers 24.8% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7P102-100
MSRP
$200-67%
$600
Avg Price (30d)
$100
$80-20%
Performance per Dollar
33.1
41.3+25%
Codename
Tiger Lake Xe
GP102
Release
August 15 2020
February 12 2018
Ranking
#493
#560