Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro P600

Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7

2020
Similar parts
······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P600

2017Core: 1430 MHzBoost: 1620 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro P600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro P600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Iris Xe Graphics G7

2020

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 40W, a 10W reduction.
  • More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro P600

2017

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro P600 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • 33.3% higher power demand at 40W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro P600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (3,318 vs 3,311), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Xe Graphics G7 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Xe Graphics G7 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro P600 has the stronger long-term case.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro P600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Iris Xe Graphics G7

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro P600

The Quadro P600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,318 points. Launch price was $178.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 scores 3,311 and the Quadro P600 reaches 3,318 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the Quadro P600 uses Pascal, both on 10 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 384 (Quadro P600).

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7Quadro P600
G3D Mark Score
3,311
3,318
Architecture
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Pascal
Process Node
10 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
96
384+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7Quadro P600
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro P600 carries 2 GB. Quadro P600 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Xe Graphics G7 and 64-bit on the Quadro P600.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7Quadro P600
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 12_1 (Quadro P600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7Quadro P600
DirectX
12.1
12_1
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P600). Decoder: QuickSync vs NVDEC 4th Gen.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7Quadro P600
Encoder
QuickSync
NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder
QuickSync
NVDEC 4th Gen
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 draws 30W versus the Quadro P600's 40W — a 28.6% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 350W (Quadro P600). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7Quadro P600
TDP
30W-25%
40W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
145mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
110.4+33%
83.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 came in at $200, while the Quadro P600 launched at $0. On MSRP, Quadro P600 was 100+% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.6 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs Infinity (Quadro P600) — the Quadro P600 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Xe Graphics G7 (2020 vs 2017).

FeatureIris Xe Graphics G7Quadro P600
MSRP
$200
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
16.6
Infinity
Codename
Tiger Lake Xe
GP107
Release
August 15 2020
February 7 2017
Ranking
#493
#558

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.