
Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon E8870PCIe

Iris Xe Graphics G7
Popular choices:

Radeon E8870PCIe
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is positioned at rank 282 and the Radeon E8870PCIe is on rank 327, so the Iris Xe Graphics G7 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe Graphics G7
Performance Per Dollar Radeon E8870PCIe
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2014). The Iris Xe Graphics G7 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon E8870PCIe lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon E8870PCIe is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Xe Graphics G7.
| Insight | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $100 versus $200 for the Radeon E8870PCIe, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 96.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+96.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Radeon E8870PCIe

Iris Xe Graphics G7
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

Radeon E8870PCIe
The Radeon E8870PCIe is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 37W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,368 points.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 scores 3,311 and the Radeon E8870PCIe reaches 3,368 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the Radeon E8870PCIe uses GCN 1.0, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 640 (Radeon E8870PCIe).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,311 | 3,368+2% |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 96 | 640+567% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon E8870PCIe has 2 GB. The Radeon E8870PCIe offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 draws 30W versus the Radeon E8870PCIe's 37W — a 20.9% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 350W (Radeon E8870PCIe). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-19% | 37W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 110.4+21% | 91.0 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 launched at $200 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Radeon E8870PCIe launched at $250 and now averages $200. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 costs 50% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) vs 16.8 (Radeon E8870PCIe) — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 offers 97% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | Radeon E8870PCIe |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200-20% | $250 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-50% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.1+97% | 16.8 |
| Codename | Tiger Lake Xe | Venus |
| Release | August 15 2020 | January 25 2014 |
| Ranking | #493 | #734 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















